Death

It's going to be a long moment of silence

Something's off with 2009, the year in which Twitter became a not only a verb but a manner in which human knowledge is condensed. I was talking yesterday with a a friend and telling her how 2009 felt like "the year in death". It wasnt just big luminaries like Michael Jackson, Teddy Kennedy and Farrah Fawcett who were gone. It was all kinds of random celebrities like Brittany Murphy, DJ AM, Karl Malden and Dom DeLouise. And of course, there's the family members who had passed away in both of our families who were not celebrities but still in our R.I.P. lists.

Then, it was while reading the list of 80 celebrity obituaries at OhNoTheyDidnt's In Remembrance - 2009 that it hit me: Here we have yet again another example of how the media as we know it is really, truly dying. It is not up TV news "producers" and newspapers editors to decided who is notable or celebrity enough to be included in these lists. Heck, it is not anymore in their control to decide who is a celebrity —Andrew WK hoaxes notwithstanding. With the advent of social media and the popularity of social spaces like Facebook and broadcasting platforms like Twitter we now have the possibility of knowing about way many more people who at one point either were celebrities or lower-level celebrities or entertainment industry workers with influence whom we would have never heard about if it were up to newspaper and newsroom chieftains.

It's going to be interesting to see the "moment of silence" moment at the Oscars evolve. Maybe the lists will get so long that they will have to drop the format or be forced to become creative with it.

With that thought, here's my 10 Radom Celebrity Obituaries for 2009:


 more this way»

liza's picture



OPEN POLL: Do you know anybody who is dying because they couldn't afford heath insurance?

What's this poll about?: 
Baton Rouge Tea Party July 2009

Am walking away from the computer right now. One of my business colleagues who is also a very good friend is basically dying. I have a blog post to write about that but that is not all. Hence the blog post to come. Hence the need to walk away ---just the thought of him makes me want to cry and scream and smack the shit out of any Republican that cross my way.

My friend is an incredibly smart guy and was working consistently albeit not as much as he would have liked. He would complain on and off about the hey-days, when he made so much money he could afford his own office in midtown and all, his weekends of non-stop partying and his own health insurance.

Now? We have no idea if he will be able to go back to work at all. Heck, we don't know if he's gonna make it all.

It is heart-breaking because as a talented and smart guy he was also very politically active. Health Insurance reform was one of his pet peeves.

As a freelancer and consultant for many years, it's what broke his back. He did a bit too much for MedicAid but not enough to be able to buy it on his own. And he and I bonded on this issue because we here for almot 5 years lived without being able to afford to pay for health insurance and with two kids.

That "kids' care" program or whatever it is called here in NYC? They still wanted us to pay close to $400/month for the privilege of our children's parents to not be able to afford out of pocket health care because all their extra money was going for their kids "state run" health insurance.

The system in the United States is just ridiculous. And it's killing people. People like my friend.

What gets me? The fact that those "compassionate conservatives" who like to think of themselves as better human beings than you and me for calling themselves christians, are the same cruel, hateful and callous people who would justify my friend's death as his fault for not trying harder.

I hate all these goddamn Republicans who are raising hell at town halls. Of course, all those assholes have medical insurance. It's not like they'd ever give that up and donate it to people like my friend to save their lives.

So back to my question : Do you know anybody who is dying because they couldn't afford heath insurance?

I have to walk away now. It just hurts too much.

liza's picture



Death By Detention

I would have subtitled this video "America's New Civil War".


From the production company :
The New York Times and the Washington Post have recently reported on the "System of Neglect," namely, the state of immigration detention center conditions. As told by her sister June Everett, watch the story of Sandra Kenley, a 52- year-old grandmother, who after living in the U.S. legally for 33 years, was subjected to these very conditions and died in immigration detention.

liza's picture



Olbermann agrees : Hillary Rodham Clinton is unfit to be President of the United States

Yesterday I wrote the following about Hillary Rodham Clinton :

Shameless.

Despicable.

Unfit to be President of the United States.

My words hit the front pages of both Daily Kos and The Moderate Voice. By evening Keith Olbermann had the following to say about Hillary Clinton's latest "gaffe" :


The most important part of the transcript is after the jump :
 more this way»

liza's picture





Today is the sixth anniversary of Daniel Pearl's death

Go read the amazing homage written in the Wall Street Journal by his father :

When an unarmed journalist is killed, we are reminded of both the freedoms that we treasure in our society, and how vulnerable we all are to forces that threaten those freedoms.

But this still does not explain the attention given to Danny's tragedy. After all, 30 other journalists were killed in 2002, and 118 journalists have been killed in Iraq alone since that war began.

The shocking element in Danny's murder was that he was killed, not for what he wrote or planned to write, but for what he represented -- America, modernity, openness, pluralism, curiosity, dialogue, fairness, objectivity, freedom of inquiry, truth and respect for all people. In short, each and every one of us was targeted in Karachi in January of 2002.

It's not a touchy feely homage, but a reminder that Daniel Pearl's blood is in all our hands, especially the media :

One of the things that saddens me most is that the press and media have had an active, perhaps even major role in fermenting hate and inhumanity. It was not religious fanaticism alone.

This was first brought to my attention by the Pakistani Consul General who came to offer condolences at our home in California. When we spoke about the anti-Semitic element in Danny's murder she said: "What can you expect of these people who never saw a Jew in their lives and who have been exposed, day and night, to televised images of Israeli soldiers targeting and killing Palestinian children."

At the time, it was not clear whether she was trying to exonerate Pakistan from responsibility for Danny's murder, or to pass on the responsibility to European and Arab media for their persistent de-humanization of Jews, Americans and Israelis. The answer was unveiled in 2004, when a friend told me that photos of Muhammad Al Dura were used as background in the video tape of Danny's murder.

[...]

The Pakistani Consul was right. The media cannot be totally exonerated from responsibility for Daniel's murder, as well as for the "tsunami of hate" that has swept the world and continues to rise.

Go read the whole thing.
 more this way»

liza's picture



On This Day

Syndicate content

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Twitter and Facebook are for...

MySpace, Facebook, and many other businesses have realized that they can give away the tools of production but maintain ownership over the resulting products. One of the fundamental economic characteristics of Web 2.0 is the distribution of production into the hands of the many and the concentration of the economic rewards into the hands of the few. It's a sharecropping system, but the sharecroppers are generally happy because their interest lies in self-expression or socializing, not in making money, and, besides, the economic value of each of their individual contributions is trivial. It's only by aggregating those contributions on a massive scale - on a web scale - that the business becomes lucrative. To put it a different way, the sharecroppers operate happily in an attention economy while their overseers operate happily in a cash economy. In this view, the attention economy does not operate separately from the cash economy; it's simply a means of creating cheap inputs for the cash economy.

From Sharecropping the long tail

— Nick Carr

Poll