Gastronomy

Anthony Bourdain whets my appetites in more ways that one




I was watching the Travel Channel the other day and I realized, Anthony Bourdain is the one man I would want to have as my mate after a nuclear holocaust or if I am left stranded in a remote island.

Viggo Mortensen and Benicio del Toro may have E-Z passes to my loins but, man, Anthony knows how to cooks. And he loves to drink. And he's a happy asshole when it comes to mixing it up with a recreational drug or two.

Did I mention he's one heck of a chef?

The man is just pure bad-boy dreaminess. He's just a bipedal icon for sex and food; my two most favorite things in the world --up there with shoes, panties and mojitos.

So I give you Anthony Bourdain, sexy gastronomic beast.


liza's picture

| | | | |
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1598 guests online.

Words to live by

Let's begin with capitalism, a word that has gone largely out of fashion. The approved reference now is to the market system. This shift minimizes --indeed, deletes-- the role of wealth in the economic and social system. And it sheds the adverse connotation going back to Marx. Instead of the owners of capital or their attendants in control, we have the admirably impersonal role of market forces. It would be hard to think of a change in terminology more in the interest of those to whom money accords power. They have now a functional anonymity.

But most of the people who use the new designation --economists, in particular-- are innocent as to the effect. They see nothing wrong with their bland, descriptive terminology. They pay no attention to the important question: Whether money "wealth" accords a special power. (It does.) Thus the term innocent fraud.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify