hate crimes

Hate Crimes Rising in America

Since 9/11, hate crimes have been almost steadily rising in America, as well as elsewhere in the world. There were a couple of years when the rise leveled off, but last year the increase continued apace. In 2006 there were more than 7,700 hate crimes in the US, a rise of more than 7%, according to the FBI.

I consider this to be part and parcel with the dominance of a political party, the Republican Party, that puts hatred and intolerance near the top of their agenda. This political agenda, cynically used to get votes and power and broadcast daily by the Fox Hate Channel, leads to real violence. The vilification of diversity by the Republican Party and their Fox mouthpieces encourages violence in America.

Here are some deatails about this rise in hate crimes, from BBC news:

More than half of the victims were attacked because of their race, while 19% were targeted because of their religion, the annual report said.

However, there were wide discrepancies, with northern states reporting far more hate crimes than the southern states, despite the South's racial history.

This is an interesting discrepancy. Some are claiming that this is misleading, since the reporting of these statistics is voluntary and each state has its own way of defining and reporting hate crime statistics, comparisons between states may be meaningless. Some argue that the reporting is more accurate and realistic in the Northern states, giving a false impression of more hate crimes. Needless to say, this is controversial and deserves further investigation, I would think. If the South really does have fewer hate crimes, it would be well worth knowing why. And if in reality it does not and the Northern states are merely more honest in their reporting of hate crimes, that also would be worth knowing.


mole333's picture



Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1245 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

In the Post article, Maryscott says at least one thing that is both true and wise, which is that her rage and her blogging are both "born of powerlessness." The problem is that Lord Acton's maxim is equally true in reverse: If power corrupts, so does powerlessness. It can lead to fatalism, apathy and irresponsibility %u2013 or to paranoia, rage and a willingness to believe evey loopy conspiracy theory that comes down the pike.

The difference, I think, between left and right is that the right has no rational justification to feel any of these things, and yet many, if not most, conservatives continue to wallow in the mindset of a besieged minority.

Liberals, much less radical progressives, really are a besieged minority in this country. So why is it suddenly considered front-page news that they're acting like one?

The answer, of course, is that if the Maryscotts of Left Blogistan are evidence of the corruption of powerlessness, the Washington Post is proof positive of Lord Acton's original argument. Given everything that's going on around us, it's hard to imagine that anyone would believe the former is more of a threat to the republic than the latter. But I guess that's what the corruption of power is all about.


— Billmon, blog publisher
Whiskey Bar: Payback


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify