Literary Theory

Truth Will Tell

Truth Be Told

By now, we’re all familiar with Oprah’s public flogging of James Frey. It’s been covered ad nauseum in the press. Certainly, for many people it has awakened a wicked sense of schadenfreude, that someone who was literally elevated to millionairehood by the accident of Oprah’s taking a liking to the story being told, has been brought so low. Whether Frey deserves the kind of praise for his writing that she initially bestowed on him is ultimately not for me to say. I know what I like, and I have accepted that the < ahref="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312422180/sr=1-1/qid=1138553046/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-4401809-4536825?%5Fencoding=UTF8">books that I find deserving of praise are not the stuff of New York Times bestseller lists. It’s doubtful you’ll ever find a book that set me on fire listed at 30 percent off at Target.

But I’ve found the Frey saga fascinating. I don’t feel duped: I never read the book. Oprah’s choices have been fairly predictable. She is someone who likes a redemption narrative. Redemption narratives are great—who doesn’t like a protagonist who gets to rise from the dead—but life is seldom like that. The people I know who have come back from the pit tell amazing tales of suffering, but I have yet to meet a single one whose post-horror life has been all sweetness and joy. No pretty packages. No neatly tied up endings. Life simply goes on. And on. But as a consequence, I tend to prefer novels or creative non-fiction where it’s not clear what lies in store for the main character other than more mess. Mess, like everything else, is cyclic.


Lorraine's picture

Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1252 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

"Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the U. S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them, and these are to be paid out of the national taxes. Does this not involve the principle of a national establishment...?"


— -- James Madison, "Essay on Monopolies" unpublished until 1946, cited in Brant, Irving, The Bill of Rights, 1965, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify