Pirates of the Caribbean

This Pirate Won't Loot the Food



  

Each time that Keira Knightley doesn't eat, a plate of clumpy rice is donated to starving children across the world:



  



  



  



  


Tara Parks's picture

| | | | | | | | | | | | |

Pirates? Aaaargh.

I don't care how much -money it made this weekend. Really. It got my matinee bucks, and I want them back. I also want the 2.5 hours of my life I spent in the theatre back.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest was bloody awful. pirates_caribbean_dead_mans_chest

Bugger.

Because I so wanted a couple hours' worth of escape. I enjoyed the first one, and I admired Johnny Depp's Captain Jack Swallow. I laughed. This time, I winced. Depp's performance felt like a parody of a parody; once you've established that a character is over-the-top, how do you top it in the sequel? By making it insufferable.

I'm not going to give away the plot, so don't worry that there are spoilers here. There was an attempt to create a complexity of plot by spinning out several spools of plot thread simultaneously, and trusting the audience to keep them all straight in their heads. All this, while being visibly revolted by the denizens of The Flying Dutchman. This time, the movie producers went for grotesque rather than spooky.


Lorraine's picture

|
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Poll

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1362 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

I have been inundated with these annoying, anonymous chain e-mails stating that Whitefolk are trying to sabotage Jamie Foxx's upcoming music show because he refused to put token white performers on the roster. And to foil the success of his show due to his insolent Black pride, they've purposely put him up against 'American Idol'. Is this true? Was Foxx acting with conviction or with racial malice? And regardless, so what? After all, of all the things to clog up my inbox with, why moral outrage regarding a televised music show, of the kind that Blackfolk have been disproportionately visible for years? Why is this what people have chosen to be up in arms about and leveraging the Internet to advocate for versus, say, Darfur, Haiti, Katrina, political corruption, corporate greed, the fight for a living wage, etc., etc.?

Regardless of where you come down on any of these issues, it is quite revealing how and why people respond to media-amplified and -skewed issues -- particularly when laced with race.

Do I think folks are kinda missing the point when they choose to carelessly and thoughtlessly forward unsubstantiated information about something as benign as a televised music show? Absolutely. But as my grandmother always used to posit: "If you're Black and not paranoid, you're crazy."


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify