Revolution

Dilbert has jumped the political shark!

Here’s your hypothetical question of the day: If it ever happened that America attacked Iran because of alleged nukes, and later confirmed it had no nuclear weapons program, and we discovered that the administration knew it all along, would it be in the best interest of the citizens of the United States to overthrow their government?


— Scott Adams in Sorry I Confused You
Cartoonist and creator of Dilbert


liza's picture

| | | | | | |

Notes on blogs and the new media revolution

Tonight I have the opportunity to talk about blogs, feminism and the Web 2.0 revolution at Barnard University's Center for Research on Women, and frankly, I'm quite excited.

You see, I've been in panel after panel where "blog experts" throw around platitudes about how blogs are revolutionary, yet nobody seems to be able to explain why. I can't even remember hearing someone like Joe Trippi explain it ... and he's written a whole book about it! (The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything)

So the question that hangs always in conferences like Blogging and Feminism : (Web)sites of resistance is, what are we calling a revolution and what is it exactly about blogs that made the revolution happen in the first place.

I have been thinking about this long and hard for a while. Actually, a few years. And every time I look at the actual structure of blog software, I end up going back to the ideas of "tricks of the weak" or Tretas del debil described by Josefina Ludmer's seminal analysis of Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz. In that article she describes how Sor Juana Ines uses her spaces of weakness --whether they be the nunnery, the kitchen or even the imposition of silence-- to defy the social, political and religious order that demanded of her not to have knowledge, not to express knowledge and, in the process, not to gain Power.


liza's picture

| | | | | | | | |
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1286 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

I am a First Amendment absolutist and I would like to read, amid the discussion of how the Delete key should be wielded, some more nuanced discusssion than I have seen on just where anyone believes the line should be drawn in censoring the Web, blogs or any other speech.

Certainly the words and images directed at Kathy are hateful and abhorrent. If a law has been broken, the accused should be prosecuted. Let's do keep in mind, however, that that person is the one who created and posted the words and images.

Beyond that, I don't see what can or should be done publicly. In case anyone hasn't noticed, anonymous abusers are not the sort of people who "own their words." There are bad people in the world. They do bad things. Bad things happen to good people.

And it multiplies the violation when good people respond in kind.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify