stem cell research

Republican Party: Anti-Life, Anti-Progress, Anti-American

Bush has chosen to use is veto for the third time. Two of those three vetoes were used to block stem cell research. Yes...vital research that offers promise to millions of people suffering from many diseases.

Stem cell research offers the chance to grow new heart valvues, allowing for quicker and safer life-saving heart surgery.

Stem cell research offers possibilities to cure Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. It offers the chance to repair and replace nerves, giving the paralyzed hope. Stem cells are useful in practically every level of medical research.

What is the down side to stem cell research? Well, I guess you don't get to incinerate all those un-used embryos that don't get used for in vitro fertilization. Why is he so in favor of burning balls of cells rather than using it to save lives?

Bush's most consistent veto has been to condemn thousands of Americans to death, dementia or paralysis when science could help them. He has turned his back on science, on medicine, on life. Everyone in America should be disgusted by Bush's veto. You can disagree about Iraq. Some may still cling to the thin belief that we might someday accomplish something, though to date the decline of Iraq under our watch has been an absolute travisty.

But how could ANYONE think they are accomplishing anything by insisting unused embryos from fertility treatments be burned instead of used to save lives?


mole333's picture

| |

Lobbying for Stem Cell Research in the Senate

The House has already passed legislation to help life-saving stem cell research. Recent polls suggest that nearly three quarters of Americans support this research. This issue was considered one of the main factors that led to the defeat of an incumbent Missouri Republican in that state's 2006 Senate race. Those who oppose it do so largely based on false information, incorrectly equating stem cell research with abortion. For more background on this issue, please go here.

The next battle ground for stem cell research is in the Senate. Extracting from a Daily Kos diary, the following are the seven "swing" senators who we need to convince to support this important research. If you or someone you know has a condition like Parkinson's or nerve injury that can be helped through stem cell research, or if one of these Senators represents you, please contact the following Senators:

Lindsey Graham: South Carolina. Phone: (202) 224-5972 FAX: (202) 224-3808
Address: 290 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510
http://lgraham.senate.gov/...

Johnny Isakson: Georgia. Phone: (202) 224-3643 FAX: (202) 228-0724
Address: 120 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510
http://isakson.senate.gov/...


mole333's picture

| |

Molly Ivins (August 30, 1944 – January 31, 2007)


The poor man who is currently our president has reached such a point of befuddlement that he thinks stem cell research is the same as taking human lives, but that 40,000 dead Iraqi civilians are progress toward democracy," from a July 2006 column urging commentator Bill Moyers to run for president.


— Molly Ivins, (August 30, 1944 – January 31, 2007)
Quotes and quips from Molly Ivins | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle


liza's picture

| | | | | | |

Keeping Promises: This is why I am praising the Democrats

Today, House Democrats passed their promised stem cell bill. Once again I feel good! I feel represented again by the politicians in Congress.

My fellow Culture Kitchen contributor, JJ Ross, has been chastising me for being a cheerleader for the Democratic Party. Something about partisan politics bugs her, and I can understand that. I alternately throw myself into it and get disgusted by it. And perhaps Steam Geek might like to notice that JJ Ross and I had quite a difference of opinion without either of us accusing the other of threatening or censorship. We just disagree, which is what this blog thing is all about, right?

But here is why I am cheering. It isn't just some kind of self-congratulatory back slapping. It's because I have watched America stagnate in pretty much every way during the period where a single party dominated everything--presidency, Congress, courts, media. Almost every promise made by Bush has been broken. Things have reached lows that I have never before seen, and I am counting Nixon and Watergate in that.

Now we are seeing a rare event in politics. In a historical election, a whole bunch of new faces came in promising a whole slew of promises and voters gave them their chance. They still face a sour-faced President who is holding his hands over his ears crying "LA LA LA LA" while the voters send him messages and they face a hostile media which is more than 50% owend by a small group people with a stated right wing agenda. But within DAYS of swearing their oath of office on whatever book they chose to swear on, this new Congress is actually keeping its promises. It is enacting everything these candidates promised they would enact, all at the very first opportunity.


mole333's picture

| | |
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 2152 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

He's gone; the policy --strategic non-communication-- may still be in place.

First, McClellan was a necessary figure in what I have called Rollback-- the attempt to downgrade the press as a player within the executive branch, to make it less important in running the White House and governing the country. It had once been accepted wisdom that by carefully "feeding the beast" an Administration would be rewarded with better coverage in the long run. Rollback, the policy for which McClellan signed on, means not feeding but starving the beast, while reducing its effectiveness as an interlocutor with the President and demonstrating to all that the fourth estate is a joke.


— Jay Rosen, old school journalist in new media clothes
PressThink: The Jerk at the Podium: Scott McClellan Steps Away


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify