Via BradBlog we have two videos. The first one shows an early voter recounting how the machine kept flipping her vote from Democrats to Republican :

In this second video we can see West Virginia Jackson County Clerk, Jeff Waybright demonstrate how when their electronic voting machines (ES&S iVotronic) "flip votes" even after they have been calibrated properly.

 more this way»

No, it's not some whinny metrosexual elitist thing.

The logic is simple : The stat's voting commissioner is banning poll workers from distributing paper ballots unless ALL MACHINES in the polling station are broken.

Yup.

So, if there's 10 machines at a polling station and 9 of them are broken, Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortés wants people to wait in line and use the one machine that is still available.

John Bonifaz, in a press release issued by Voter Action, explains why this is beyond stupid and just veering into plain old dangerous : 

“Voters should not be forced to wait hours in line in order to exercise their
fundamental right to vote,” says John Bonifaz, legal director for Voter Action
and co-counsel for the plaintiffs. “While the use of electronic voting
machines continues to pose a separate threat to the integrity of the vote-
counting process, federal court intervention is necessary to ensure that voters
will not be disenfranchised by long lines on Election Day in Pennsylvania,
when these machines become inoperable.”

“Pennsylvania’s Secretary of the Commonwealth has issued a directive to all
Pennsylvania counties requiring that emergency paper ballots be distributed
only when 100% of voting machines malfunction on Election Day,” says
Jonathan Abady, a partner at the New York-based law firm Emery Celli
Brinckerhoff & Abady, and co-counsel for the plaintiffs. “If left unchanged,
this standard will place an undue burden on voters across the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.”

Full press release after the jump.
 more this way»

Making my life far easier in digesting the news :

ACORN registers lots of lower income and/or minority voters. They operate all across the country and do a lot of things beside voter registration. What's key to understand is their method. By and large they do not rely on volunteers to register voters. They hire people -- often people with low incomes or even the unemployed. This has the dual effect of not only registering people but also providing some work and income for people who are out of work. But because a lot of these people are doing it for the money, inevitably, a few of them cut corners or even cheat. So someone will end up filling out cards for nonexistent names and some of those slip through ACORN's own efforts to catch errors. (It's important to note that in many of the recent ACORN cases that have gotten the most attention it's ACORN itself that has turned the people in who did the fake registrations.) These reports start buzzing through the right-wing media every two years and every time the anecdotal reports of 'thousands' of fraudulent registrations turns out, on closer inspection, to be either totally bogus themselves or wildly exaggerated. So thousands of phony registrations ends up being, like, twelve.

Go read the whole thing.
 more this way»

Location

This from an email just received from Working Assets' Act For Change via US Newswire:

Washington, Nov. 7 -- MoveOn.org Political Action is offering a $250,000 reward for new material evidence leading to a felony conviction for an organized effort of partisan voter suppression or electronic voting fraud.

Throughout the day accusations of election fraud and voter suppression incidents have been flooding into state and federal authorities throughout the country. In Virginia, the FBI has launched a criminal investigation into charges of voter suppression. In 20 Congressional districts, NRCC robocalls appearing to come from Democrats harassed voters with repeated calls in an apparently coordinated campaign to suppress the vote.

Complementing an earlier reward for whistleblowers, MoveOn's reward is being offered to anyone who provides this information.