Seminar: How Scientists Can Work Effectively with the Media

The Union of Concerned Scientists is hosting a seminar to correspond with the annual American Association for the Advancement of Sciences meeting in San Francisco. Now normally I might be at that meeting, but a change in field and having a small child mean this is not a meeting I will be attending. But I throw this out there for anyone who will be.

From the Union of Concerned Scientists:

You are invited! UCS will be in San Francisco during the AAAS annual meeting. We will be hosting a special workshop on “How Scientists Can Work Effectively with the Media.” Join us for a luncheon and presentation with Rich Hayes, UCS Media Director and author of “A Scientists Guide to Talking with the Media: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists.”

Rich, along with guest reporters, will walk through the challenging intersection of science and media and provide concrete tips and skills to promote accurate and timely coverage of important scientific and economic developments. The one hour luncheon presentation will be followed by a chance for you to practice your interview skills and get real-time feedback in one-on-one sessions with experts. This training will build on previous UCS trainings and is appropriate for those with media experience wishing to tighten their skills as well as those with more limited media experience.

If you will be in San Francisco on February 17, 2007 and would like to attend this special luncheon, please email ssi@ucsusa.org to RSVP. Although convenient to the AAAS conference, this event is not an official part of the AAAS meeting and is open to those not attending the conference. Details will follow as the event nears.

Date: February 17, 2007
Time: 12:00 - 2:00 PM
Place: Westin St. Francis, Union Square, San Francisco
RSVP: ssi@ucsusa.org

If you are attending the AAAS meeting, we invite you to attend Symposium 180-08 on February 16, “Communicating Climate Change: Strategies for Effective Engagement” with UCS Deputy Director of the Global Environment Program Nancy Cole.


Union of Concerned Scientists


| | |

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1063 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

But, when it came down to, this case was made into a racial issue, which it shouldn't have been. It should have been an issue about a woman who was raped by three men. Case closed.

The fact that she was black and they were white only plays into the fetishization of Black women and white men that has developed through years of inequal treatment. This also biased many people because it made this case into a national spectacle. It split people along racial lines instead of factual lines and investigating the story that the woman told instead of going on a witch hunt.

Additionally, this case was turned into an issue of class as well. The Black, poor woman was raped by the rich white kids. Many wanted to see these men be charged because they felt it would put them in their rightful place, strip them of the privilege that they had been so accustomed to all of their lives.

All of the things that this case stood for are all of the things that were wrong with the media's coverage of the case, the national obsession with the case, and the prosecution of the case. It became an issue of stripping privilege and proving that white people were not superior instead of ensuring that this woman was actually treated properly and had her CORRECT assailants brought to justice, not for political reasons but for criminal reasons.


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify