 |
|
|
||
Visit our sponsorsUpcoming eventsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsBuy it!Most EmailedVisit our sponsors |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
| |
Google AdsThe Big Dialog
| ||
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 1327 guests online.
Online users | ||
Instant CongressWords to live by
"We live in poverty, without any basic facilities and no one coming to enquire about our problems. All of a sudden all the television crew, media persons and doctors wearing surgical masks are roaming our dirt roads to collect more statistics. Our chickens were our only source of income and now they have destroyed even that. Is this what is called governance?" Subscribe Buttons                    | ||
Huh?
No, not really. CLinton CONTAINED Hussein, as the UN intended, and prevented him from rebuilding his military. Notice how when we did (illegally) invade Hussein had no airforce and hardly a tank corps? His military was in a shambles. You can thank Clinton's policy of containment for that.
Now, if you remember, Clinton was accused of being obsessed with al-Qaeda. He repeatedly advised cutting off their funding by reforming international financial laws and actually attacking al-Qaeda bases. If only Bush and the Republicans had listed to his obsession rather than obsessing on Iraq.
So, to put it plainly, you are wrong.