JJ Ross's picture

All Journalism

has this problem, even though journalism is supposedly so enlightened and leftist generally, so it's not just the blogosphere much less one corner of it that should concern those who rant over such mis-models.

Not that I think ranting will help, but at least that larger perspective is something to add to the script, if documenting the larger need for meaningful reform is really the cause at hand?

Maybe try Columbia Journalism Review and/or the Society of American Newspaper Editors to start, and books like this?

And there are reports such as "Unfettered Press: Minorities in Journalism" (I can save you the trouble of looking; blacks are about five percent, it says) and "http://www.namic.com/">NAMIC: Empowering Today's Multi-ethnic Diversity in Communications"

But then why stop with black journalists, either? What about professors and teachers of journalism, indeed all professors and teachers, period? They influence everything about our cultural identity one way or another, as does religion. What percentage of Catholics are bending black knees? Hmmm, that shouldn't be hard to Google either . . .

I have my own misrepresentation madness to rant about, being Southern and so backward and all. Here's a new think piece from Bob Moser of the Nation on that:

The "notion that the South is more than just 'different,' that it is distinct from the rest of the nation ... an inexplicable variant from the national norm," is a false exaggeration, wrote Zinn, that "feeds self-righteousness in the North ... And it stands so firmly and so high on a ledge of truth that one must strain to see the glitter of deception in its eye." . . .
By the 2032 elections, the South is expected to control almost 40 percent of the electoral votes for President -- more than the shrinking Northeast and Midwest combined.

And yet a stubborn belief in the poor, backward, reactionary cracker South of myth still shapes and distorts American politics. By surrendering the region, Democrats have simultaneously abandoned the old hope of a durable national progressive majority.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 1844 guests online.

Words to live by

"We all agree that neither the Government nor political parties ought to interfere with religious sects. It is equally true that religious sects ought not to interfere with the Government or with political parties. We believe that the cause of good government and the cause of religion suffer by all such interference."


— -- Rutherford B. Hayes, Statement as Governor of Ohio, 1875, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify