Margaret Bassett's picture

All of the above

If we mark the best box on a multiple test, they usually let you cop out with one or two really likely choices. A good test taker learns the ropes. Sometimes he/she learns the subject.
I respect your knowledge and know you have background which we should take seriously. The above facetious remarks deal with more than voter apathy. On this page, let's call it culture.
New rules for administering elections are certainly needed. Of course, we will have to iron out the kinks between recent federal laws like HAVA and Voters' Rights mandates and what the states have jealously contended were their province. At the moment a lot of criticism against voter irregularities falls on the shoulders of Secretaries of State, rightly or wrongly.
Even with strict rules for mandatory voting, we will have suspicion of the system. In my view, it really starts with candidates' advertising. (During the 04 campaign, I heard from voters that they were sick of Kerry's saying "I have a plan." I was on his side and I was also.) I do not believe that requiring a jaundiced voter to vote will make a thoughtful voter.
In the long run, those who excuse their lack of voting do so with "None of them know what I need." Or "They'll tell you anything until they get in office."
It appears that campaign finance reform creates more money--and chicanery--than before. It's a little like Moore's law in computer memory, an exponential increase. And now early primaries add more strain on constraint.
In what ways would obligatory voting create even more chasing to the bottom line? I do not believe that blogging has helped. In some cases, it hurts, because many enthusiastic bloggers seem to equate support with money. I can't help but think of the Supreme Court case's "money is speech" edict and wonder when the screaming will start. Just looking at Mitch McConnell on C-Span gets me started on that catastrophy.
In closing this, I repeat that the idea of mandatory voting is probably a good idea. But to make it palatable to the disillusioned and reflective of true majority sentiment, we will need to put that idea in context with the zealotry of campaign handlers, media, and advertising companies.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 638 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

"Way down deep the American people are afraid of an entangling relationship between formal religions -- or whole bodies of religious belief -- and government. Apart from constitutional law and religious doctrine, there is a sense that tells us it's wrong to presume to speak for God or to claim God's sanction of our particular legislation and his rejection of all other positions. Most of us are offended when we see religion being trivialized by its appearance in political throw-away pamphlets."


— -- Mario Cuomo, address, University of Notre Dame, September 13, 1984, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify