Nobody needs to be told how to use the lounge chair. "Users" of any age, background, or degree of sophistication can immediately comprehend it: take it in, in almost all of its details, at a single glance. It is self-revealing to the point of transparency, and the same can be said of most domestic furniture: you lie on a bed, put books and DVDs and tchotchkes on shelves, laptops and flowers and dinner on tables. Did anyone ever have to tell you this?
The same cannot be said of the iPod - which, remember, is one of the best-thought-out and comparatively simple digital artifacts ever developed, demonstrating market-leading insight into users and what they want to do with the things they buy. Take off your power user hat, try to imagine life without the chops you've earned over the course of your involvement with these complex artifacts, and you'll see that to people encountering an iPod for the first time it's not obvious what it does, or how to get it to do that. It may not even be obvious how to turn the thing on.
You don't have to configure the chair, or set preferences. You needn't worry about compatible file formats. You can take it out of one room or house and drop it into another, and it still works exactly the same way as it did before, with no adjustment. It never reminds you that a new version of its firmware is available, and that certain of its features will not be available until you do choose to upgrade. As much as I love the iPod, none of this can be said for it.
No...just you
You are the one we tend to automatically find fault with...because you tend to say very inaccurate things. Really, I am not kidding when I say the mention of your name elicits eye rolling among people we both know. Sorry, but it is true.
Really, my friend. Please notice how you tend to get negative reactions wherever you post from a variety of people. That really should say something you. At a bare minimum it means the way you say things tends to be misinterpreted. If so, maybe we can work to correct that. But it requires a recognition on your part that you do tend to say things in ways that irritate. And it is by no means just Bouldin and myself. You did not specify that the question was rhetorical. To me it was not obvious. Perhaps that is just me...but perhaps not.
Now, as to your points, I am not sure you brought up anything new. If so, please elaborate. I know you and I have much common ground in belief if not in approach. So I am open.