Fox Takes Another Hit

Barack Obama was the first to, quietly, refuse to deal with Fox News because of their bias and their racist, anti-Semitic and pro-terrorism stands. Rumors, unconfirmed as far as I am aware, circulated that he turned down all interview requests from Fox.

Then came the foolish idea by the Nevada Democrats to team up with right wing extremist Fox News and hold a forum with the Democratic Presidential candidates. Huge pressure came from the liberal blogsphere (with a few dissenting voices who don't seem to get that Fox News is no longer anything but extremist, pro-violence propoganda we should distance ourselves from) for Nevada Dems to drop the idea. Fox bloviated. John Edwards was the first to refuse to participate in the forum if Fox was involved and ultimately the Nevada Democratic Party saw the error of its ways and dropped Fox News like the vile, decayed corpse of journalism that it is. Personally I thanked the Nevada Dems with a donation and urge you to do the same.

Now, Fox hits another roadblock in its rather suspicious eagerness to hold a forum for the Democratic candidates. The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) decided to form an alliance with Fox News to hold a Presidential forum, making people wonder if they had slept through the Nevada brouhaha. Once again blogs came into play asking the CBC what they were doing given the racist attacks they have made in the past and their blatant lies about Barack Obama, a member of the CBC. But now the forum is moot. First John Edwards said he would refuse to have anything to do with the forum if Fox is in the deal. Then Barack Obama (again, a member of the CBC!) and, a little later, Hillary Clinton, both followed Edwards' lead. That would make any such forum kind of useless, if the three front runners refuse to attend.

It really makes you wonder: Why is Fox so darned eager to hold a forum for the Democratic primary? They blatantly right winged biased in everything they do. Yet they seem to be scrambling like crazy to host events for the Democratic candidates. This should make everyone VERY suspicious. I am glad that our candidates are doing the right thing! Bravo Edwards, Obama and Clinton!


mole333's picture

| | | | | |

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1367 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Clinton had to raise the stakes by raising the bar: It’s Tuesday or bust.

And along with victimhood, Clinton has finally found a powerful theme, the same theme that George W. Bush used at his convention and in his reelection campaign in 2004: Vote for me or die.

With her “3 a.m. phone call” ad, she is saying exactly what Bush said: I will protect you and your children, and the other guy will not.

Yes, there is irony in a Democrat trying to getting the nomination by adopting a Republican tactic, but, hey, you know what? It worked back then, and Clinton is betting it will work now.


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify