STEPHEN FOX's picture

RICHARDSON'S RESUME

Great article on Governor Richardson. This is what one New Mexican has to say:
Richardson's International Resume is Urgently Needed.

“One thing the Bush administration has never understood is that diplomacy and military power are not alternatives to one another, but rather are
complementary sources of strength. Because diplomacy without power is weak, and power without diplomacy is blind.”

This is the core of New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson’s international platform, taken from a speech he gave in New Hampshire in late 2006, and the
kind of insight he gained as a UN Ambassador and Energy Secretary during Clinton. His international resume is a breath of fresh air, and since the
USA needs urgently to rebuild and to entirely rethink its international policies, after 6 years of corporate Halliburton-driven plutocracy, I believe Richardson really MUST become President.

Our domestic economy is in the pits because of hundreds of billions of dollars going to Iraq and to Afghanistan, mostly military expenditures, all to advance the Bush Administration’s corporate agenda. Other nations are capitalizing on our errors and our distractions, like China with its trillion dollar balance of payments, as well as Russia, which funded many of the developing nations in their colonial struggles, both pointing to our oppressive presence in Iraq, telling African, South Asian, and South
American nations that they are perfectly willing to BUY their natural resources, instead of plundering them.

The international backlash of a totally failed USA foreign policy has profound implications for a worsening USA domestic economy, and the situation is getting seriously worse by the day. This is why I support Bill Richardson’s presidential campaign. He recently stated the war would be over on his first day in office, and his trip to North Korea is already bringing important results.

Here is another quote from 3/28: "I would not leave any troops in Iraq. ... If I were president today, I would withdraw by the end of this calendar year…. But I would also have a reconciliation conference of the
three religious groups, forge a coalition government, and divide the country into three entities. ... I don't believe you need a residual force in Iraq.
I believe you need any troops that you can deploy from Iraq. I would put them in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda and the Taliban are serious threats"
("Hardball," MSNBC, 3/28).

How about putting USA’s troops nowhere, for a change?] Truly,

Stephen Fox
(P.S. I am in no way connected with the Richardson campaign; these are my own views entirely)
New Millennium Fine Art
217 W. Water St.
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Stephen@santafefineart.com
505 983-2002


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1550 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

How do we know? I mean, what you're saying is fine. But how do we know that that's actually the law? I mean there are a lot of people who absolutely in very good faith would say that isn't competing harm. They would say that the competing right for the life of the fetus is more important than the possibility of the mother having children in the future herself. See, there are people in good faith on both sides of this argument. And so how do we know that ... your competing harms defense is going to do for this particular woman what a health exception would do?


— Justice Stephen Breyer


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify