rwallnerny2007's picture

Unity '08

jj said: "manipulating all the media they can dominate to keep systemic change from being taken seriously by real, regular, reasonable people going about their private business"

See this is what gets politicos in both major parties upset. The republican and democratic parties have existed historically, and carry the influence they do, because they pretty accurately reflect the societal divisions in this country. There have been many other parties past and present, but the two party sytem has worked because the divisions are clear enough that people have come together in order to be more effective. Fiscal conservatives and evangelicals could have their own separate party, but they have more power working together as one party. Same with teachers and other labor union leaders. Both political parties have been ABOUT "real, regular, reasonable people" coming together to make common cause. Go to your local democratic or republican party committee meeting, and you will see "real, regular, reasonable people" You greatly insult the rank and file of both parties by acting as if they are brain dead idiots being manipulated by party brass. You wouldn't act that way if you attended lower level party functions and appreciated the historical role of each party. Why is it that when a party tries to play its role and build up support, all of a sudden it becomes "manipulative" and its leaders are treated like alien beings instead of human beings. I know people who have dedicated their lives to the Democratic Party, and have great influence in their own ways. They are "real, reasonable, regular" people. You don't lose your humanity by joining Party leadership!

I like Sam Waterson, but I disagree with his Unity '08 approach. There is not this great middle ground in America, where all the "real, regular, reasonable" people exist. There is a war going on in this country, and in war time when a great enemy army is out there, if you cannot come together in coalitions, form great armies, like political parties, then you will be destroyed. All Waterson's effort will do is pull moderates away from the Democratic side. The evangelical right wing isn't going moderate. Not when they have clear views on what is good and evil, what is god and anti-god. Unity '08 could do as much harm as Ralph Nader and the Green Party did in 2000.

Remember that? Nader said "real, regular, reasonable" people shouldn't belong to either of the two major parties. As a result, we've had eight years of Bush as president, instead of Al Gore. And you have seen the consequences. In a war you MUST come together in large coalitions, and accept all that is good or bad along with it. Because you win wars with big armies, not small ones.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1711 guests online.

Words to live by

"The divorce between church and state should be absolute. It ought to be so absolute that no Church property anywhere, in any state, or in the nation, should be exempt from equal taxation; for if you exempt the property of any church organization, to that extent you impose a tax upon the whole community."


— -- James A. Garfield, Congressional Record (1874), 2:5384, quoted from Gene Garman, "Church and State Separation"


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify