The Publisher
Liza Sabater
Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen
Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers
Daily Gotham
Feminist Bloggers
Network
BlogSheroes
A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling
Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog
Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.
And where will impatience get you?
No where.
No one EVER said stop agitating on Iraq. Never. At least not around here.
Since January, the debate has shifted dramatically. That is a first and necessary step to a policy change. Particularly given the situation in the Senate. Let me be absolutely clear: NOTHING can be done on Iraq as long as the Senate is 50-50, because it will ALWAYS fail in the Senate even if Democrats (plus Sanders) are 100% united.
That is the reality on the ground. And that is the situation Democrats have to work within. The only way to do that is to keep pushing. And for us, we have to push BOTH Democrats AND Republicans because without some Republican Senators backing withdrawal (or some big victories in November 2008) we WILL NOT be able to withdraw. Cheney's tie breaking vote and the filibuster will prevent that.
In the mean time progress is being made on other fronts. Ignoring that progress is to indicate that voters don't care about minimum wage, energy policy, etc. I think that is a damned lousy message to be sending.
Blowing smoke? No. It's called fighting a multi-front campaign. And single issue people would get my attention better if they stopped the "your with us 100% or to hell with you" attitude.