Show me the money! What money?

Who makes money and who cares? What is money? A symbol of wealth as described in text books? Congealed energy as I’ve heard it described in think tank circles? However it is explained, money cannot be eaten. For protection from weather, one newspaper outranks a hundred-dollar bill.
Mostly, we could agree money needs the helping hand of a number to make it relevant and a country to make it real. Countries can be relevant only as long as they have a currency. Be it cruzeiro or yen, we identify with a qualifier in front of the currency’s name (Brazilian and Japanese). Currently it takes less than .80 Euro to buy a US dollar.
We used to hear about “the almighty dollar” but not now.
All Americans do not think the same about money. Some, with piles of it, worry that if they don’t watch out, “the government” will write laws to tax it. Those most covetous even worry about what the government wants to do with it after they die.
Some of us have enough to “get by” but are afraid of falling behind. Our table talk is filled with “what ifs.”
And then there are those who scarcely have money. They live from paycheck to paycheck, hoping there’ll be one. In their world, they hope the lights stay on so they can watch beautiful cars hug the curves of American scenery and movies where there are other curves to be hugged. To break their trance, politicians come on with flashy ads to tell them how their troubles will disappear if they vote for them. They can’t buy cars. They can’t buy beauty products, and they don’t fall for politicians who “all sound the same.”
I’ve been thinking about LBJ and JRE lately. President Johnson, who is remembered first for the Viet Nam war and second for such legislation as the voting rights act, put in place through his Great Society many safety net programs which those caught in poverty turn to.
I jokingly considered running for president until I found out that Lyndon Johnson was more deprived than I was when we were growing up. John Edwards had it a lot easier than I did, but I take him at his word that it was hard to graduate from the school of hard knocks. I settle by giving presidential candidates my two cents’ worth--about all I give them.
I’ve observed what closing textile factories did to people in my hometown. In 1988, I took a two-week vacation and came back to find the Levy’s plant up the road was closing. Iraq, with two President Bush wars, impacted Tennessee. Families have to adjust while someone is sent overseas when they thought they were hired to be “weekend warriors.”
ALCOA used to be a mainstay for good jobs. They automated. But not nearly as much as Nippondenso. Denso is our premier job provider, but they do not countenance unions, and my friends who work there describe how brutal the hours can be. You work as needed or you don’t work. Tennessee is a “right to work” state, which colloquially is called right to starve.
We’re the Volunteer State. If a child has something serious like leukemia, someone puts an article in the paper. For five dollars you can have a plate of pinto beans, some cornbread, some pickin’ and grinnin’ and get that “good feeling.” Before Christmas, groceries set out barrels so that we can buy a jar of peanut butter or can of tuna for the mountain folk. All the while, someone will pipe up with the customary observation: “It makes me feel so good. It does me more good than it does them.”
When ARC was in its heyday, things were easier in the hollers. Senator Howard Baker was sure to get good appropriations for the Appalachian RC (not sure of what the initials stood for).
There are two ways to study about poverty in my view. One is to be helpful when one sees a need and not be crowing about it. If one toots one’s own horn, I call that “noblesse oblige.” I am not a person of royalty and I feel no obligation to give a helping hand. It’s just practical with me. Practical in the sense that if you teach a man to fish you won’t have to keep giving him your fish. I can’t adequately describe how my hackles stand up when I hear someone say that the best way of reducing poverty is through entrepreneurship, thus providing jobs, thus ending poverty. “A hand up instead of a hand out” can be good, but not if the “trickle down”doesn’t work and the government has to give tax breaks to the trickler.
I get back to the second definition I gave. Money is congealed energy. If someone puts out real energy, there should be more than a trickle to keep the national economy afloat. We can opine over China and illegal workers. I stick with the people in my neighborhood. They must learn not to be grateful for not starving.


Margaret Bassett's picture

|

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1717 guests online.

Words to live by

In the Post article, Maryscott says at least one thing that is both true and wise, which is that her rage and her blogging are both "born of powerlessness." The problem is that Lord Acton's maxim is equally true in reverse: If power corrupts, so does powerlessness. It can lead to fatalism, apathy and irresponsibility %u2013 or to paranoia, rage and a willingness to believe evey loopy conspiracy theory that comes down the pike.

The difference, I think, between left and right is that the right has no rational justification to feel any of these things, and yet many, if not most, conservatives continue to wallow in the mindset of a besieged minority.

Liberals, much less radical progressives, really are a besieged minority in this country. So why is it suddenly considered front-page news that they're acting like one?

The answer, of course, is that if the Maryscotts of Left Blogistan are evidence of the corruption of powerlessness, the Washington Post is proof positive of Lord Acton's original argument. Given everything that's going on around us, it's hard to imagine that anyone would believe the former is more of a threat to the republic than the latter. But I guess that's what the corruption of power is all about.


— Billmon, blog publisher
Whiskey Bar: Payback


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify