JohnM's picture

Good analysis

I have already decided on John Edwards.

Your analysis is quite well done. I was particularly interested in your comments on some of the subtleties of his speech and plans. I think these are things I take for granted. You may be very correct when you assert that some miss them. Certainly the media misses them... if they report on Edwards at all.

A couple of things I want to add.

An important and much missed aspect of John Edwards' campaign is his ability to focus on the important things. For example, all of the candidates knew that health care was, and continues to be, a major issue for all Americans, yet none came to the campaign with a thorough, well thought out plan to introduce universal health coverage. Senator Edwards did.

Another thing that I admire about the Senator is his willingness to address causes. Addressing poverty, education, health, government influence peddling, and government corporatization are among the most important causes that negatively impact the quality of life here in the United States and around the world.

I didn't put corporatization at the head of the list although cases can be made that this is the prevalent cause. Considering the ownership of the Federal Reserve, etc., I can hear the corporatists now, to paraphrase an old commercial, "It's not nice to fool corporate interests."

John Edwards is willing to take these people on. Though he states that you don't invite them to the table because they eat all the food, I think he might invite them once they're muzzled. Corporate interests do have a role in our quality of life, just not the "only" role as those interests constantly promote.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1757 guests online.

Words to live by

I assume Hillary will win the presidency. I find myself going through an involuntary process of accommodation to the idea. That is an advantage of emerging as the inevitable nominee so early. On the other hand, a year from now, she'll still be hovering around, not achieving anything, but just being what she always was, the inevitable nominee. That's going to be really boring. What happens to the hunger for change?


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify