Brian's picture

Transparent viciousness?

Transparent viciousness? Damn. I am neither an Obama or Clinton supporter (Edwards was my pick). I am a young man of color who has been taken aback by all this. Did you see the clips of the Clintons' statements on video? Both of their comments were distorted by a sound-bite obsessed press (Yes, even the "MLK diss;" seriously, check out the clip and you'll realize she's discussing about making sure one must turns dream into REALITY by taking advantage of political skill; at worst, it wasn't perfectly worded considering sound-bites).

Let's set aside supporters for a second: Why are you not holding Obama to account for the outrageously inflammatory antics of his national co-chair, Jesse Jackson, Jr.? My God, the man said--the day after the NH primary--that Clinton's emotional moment was in response to her "appearance" and that she didn't give a damn about Katrina survivors (Assumption: compassion can only be proven if one gets emotional on TV, which is odd considering that Obama didn't get emotional on camera and dismissed the notion that the Bush administration's ugly response was in any way racially motivated, stating "incompetence is color blind").

Here's the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNrlSn7ndAA&e

Now, if we're going to hold Clinton responsible for her supporter (Johnson in particular; Cuomo's stupid word choice in reference to retail politics--not Obama), then why not attack Michael Eric Dyson for declaring that any criticism of Obama is "racial in subtext" and strongly implying that white women NH Clinton voters were racist? I mean, that was just nonsense (There was no Bradley Effect).

Here's the Dyson transcript: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22598268/

I didn't even mention Obama's office SC primary memo or the fact that the Obama campaign had bigotry problems itself, most notably with the D-Punjab letter and McClurkin. And yet Obama is the "real deal?"

Yes, I agree that Steinem was just wrong, but to fan the flames of racial divisiveness unnecessarily when it's obvious the press is just having a field day with this and Obama enjoying a ridiculous double standard will only ensure a GOP victory.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Poll

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1352 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

Nobody needs to be told how to use the lounge chair. "Users" of any age, background, or degree of sophistication can immediately comprehend it: take it in, in almost all of its details, at a single glance. It is self-revealing to the point of transparency, and the same can be said of most domestic furniture: you lie on a bed, put books and DVDs and tchotchkes on shelves, laptops and flowers and dinner on tables. Did anyone ever have to tell you this?

The same cannot be said of the iPod - which, remember, is one of the best-thought-out and comparatively simple digital artifacts ever developed, demonstrating market-leading insight into users and what they want to do with the things they buy. Take off your power user hat, try to imagine life without the chops you've earned over the course of your involvement with these complex artifacts, and you'll see that to people encountering an iPod for the first time it's not obvious what it does, or how to get it to do that. It may not even be obvious how to turn the thing on.

You don't have to configure the chair, or set preferences. You needn't worry about compatible file formats. You can take it out of one room or house and drop it into another, and it still works exactly the same way as it did before, with no adjustment. It never reminds you that a new version of its firmware is available, and that certain of its features will not be available until you do choose to upgrade. As much as I love the iPod, none of this can be said for it.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify