 |
|
|
||
Visit our sponsorsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsMost Emailed
Visit our sponsorsUpcoming events |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
| |
Words to live by
Q: Could we review some of the concepts that you've introduced into economics and see if you think they still have relevance? For example, the concept of "countervailing power." Galbraith: Over the years--over the century just passed--one of the important counters to monopoly power in the corporate world was the development of countervailing power, certainly by trade unions, certainly by farmer cooperatives, certainly by other corporations. Power begets power, and I still hold very strongly to that view, which I first published, believe it or not, some fifty years ago. Instant CongressSubscribe Buttons                    | ||
This is a stupid poll
It's quite possible that Clinton could end up with a better delegate total if she barely lost both Texas and Ohio than if she lost one state considerably and won the other marginally. The question shouldn't be about states, but about delegate totals for the day. If she wins the totals, maybe that's an argument for her to stay, if she loses the totals, that's definitely an argument for her to leave.