mole333's picture

You can get it straight as well

Don't lecture me. I was probably more informed about the lies that got us into the war than you were at the time. Remember Colin Powell's supposedly key testimony before the UN? I was watching that and shaking my head, but many believed Powell when they wouldn't have believed Bush.

Democrats did not make a case based on lies and false intelligence to justify the invasion. Republicans did that. Democrats were presented with "evidence" (later shown to not only be false, but KNOWN to be false) that Hussein had a weapons program and may have links to al-Qaeda. Speaking for myself I knew at the time Bush was lying, but Congress by and large went along with it. But in no way did they initiate this war. It was a Republican engineered war. Democrats were caught up in the foolishness at first. But now most Democrats are against it and we need even more such Dems, which is what this diary is all about.

You can repeat Nader talking points, if you like, but I won't let you outright lie. Not one Democrat, except for then Dem Lieberman (and we later rejected him first chance we could), was in on the initial pack of lies that got us into this mess. They BELIEVED the lies and probably should have known better. But to blame them for those Republican engineered lies is misleading in the extreme. And extremely inappropriate in a diary focused on people who are OPPOSED to the war and who suffered more than most Americans from it.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1238 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

The quality of being genuine is hard to convey, and deciding who should be president based solely on that basis can lead to disaster; you need brains and an ability to go with the flow as well. But voters know a phony above all and Romney came off as one from the get-go. Over the last decade he had changed his views in a rightward direction on so many issues to suit what he thought he needed to win the GOP nomination that he ended up standing for nothing but his own ambition.

[...]

It's no accident that the GOP race is down to three men who are clear about who they are: McCain, Huckabee and, yes, Ron Paul.


— Howard Fineman in Burying Mitt.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify