i don't need Baby Jane

i came across the FDL post and thought, what the hell, i'll post a comment. i never post comments in the "big" blogs because there are usually hundreds, and most of them aren't really worth reading. but Jane Hamsher was replying to a number of them in her post on Liza, so i gave it a try:

i’m not exactly sure why this post is necessary. as it happens, Liza can actually be reached and spoken to personally. imagine. some people, when attacked in a manner they think unfair, by someone who is actually seeking the same goals (2 minutes at her website proves that), would keep it private. in the spirit of seeking a better community, they’d find out what brought on the original attack and try to find a positive resolution. you don’t indicate you tried that; you don’t approve of talking to people first? of privately making your points and giving her a chance to retract? you may be in the right in terms of the access you give to a diverse group of writers, but this post is pure 8th grade. very disappointing.

but i’m sure the neocon lurkers enjoyed it.

and Jane deemed it worthy of this reply:

You apply a yardstick to one you don’t apply to the other. Liza didn’t even bother to verify the factual accuracy of her assertions, let alone privately communicate her concerns.

Our neocon lurkers no doubt recognize themselves in your logic.

to which my final reply was:

ah, i get it: “she did it, so i’ll do it, too.”

and that's the gist of it in FDL re: Liza. Jane Hamsher, blogging superstar, knows nothing about Liza, less than i do (and i know little), but she deems her worthy of national attack. she's so dedicated to this attack, she's still replying into the 400s. wow.

i don't know if she is full of herself, a true believer, or really thinks Liza is doing harm to the cause. i don't know her at all, but i'm not going to waste my time with FDL anymore. her reply to me just is too immature. and her sycophantic commenters are pretty awaful, too; one guy went to a lot of trouble to prove, in a phony academic style, what a loser Liza is. i know two things about Liza: she has been involved in the things she critiqued in her original post; and she's beloved of Lynn, and that's good enough for me.

but mostly, Jane Hamsher is acting like a child. we have enough of that in DC without lefties making it worse.


t.a.'s picture



Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 5 users and 813 guests online.

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by


The primaries are in a very true sense a practice run for the White House, and if you emerge with high marks, as Obama has, it's a pretty clear statement of the kind of government you would run. Obama has shown a steadiness in demeanor and message. Clinton has blown through $120 million dollars, and her persona is more confused than ever.


— Eleanor Clift, Day of Reckoning For Clinton


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify