vee's picture

btw, that (sic) was yours, not mine...

also...just wondering if we were watching the same movie at all... all these points you keep making about 'victims', and antagonists, and morality...

it's about LIFE. as imperfect as it is... and male and female 'roles'... which, by the way... no one tries to define in this movie... no one claims only males or only females cheat.. and no one claims only women or only men ruin their marriages... and the way men and women interact...no one is saying anyone has to become a father to become a 'good citizen.' don't know if you were sleeping in sex ed, but all that's required to become a father is a penis and a vagina... and sometimes you don't even need both. or either? ok ok.. not yet...

but anyway, obviously you are the type of person to read WAY too deeply into... everything probably.. and your overly-feminist views really seem to blind you from very simple concepts... or PLOTS. even the way you just said to that guy/girl "nice of you to speak for her." is it wrong for him/her to mention how he/she sees their FIANCE??? most people would assume for them to be ENGAGED they probably know eachother failry well.. however, you, of course, find a fault in the fact the tried to describe them? i higly doubt you are a happy individual in general, and i'd be willing to bet a lot of money that you are ALONE.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1770 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

Here’s your hypothetical question of the day: If it ever happened that America attacked Iran because of alleged nukes, and later confirmed it had no nuclear weapons program, and we discovered that the administration knew it all along, would it be in the best interest of the citizens of the United States to overthrow their government?


— Scott Adams in Sorry I Confused You
Cartoonist and creator of Dilbert


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify