The good and the bad of Star Wars : Return of the Jedi



If you were close to my little piece of First Avenue around 9pm, you may well have heard me screaming and whooping it up. I'd just finished watching Return of the Jedi when I saw the man that makes the ending of that movie so right : Sebastian Shaw, the actor who played the older Anakin Skywalker in the 1983 original movie.

Nothing in pop culture has shocked me out of my wits so much like the ending of the 2004 digitally remastered version of this movie. Honestly, I was shaken by how confusing it was to see Christian Hayden's Anakin insted of Sebastian Shaw's. It was the arrogance of George Lucas that really upset me the most. How could he? How could George Lucas take this movie and mess with the ending? I mean, this is one of those seminal movies that changed the whole cultural narrative around son/father myths!

Then I noticed as I was researching for this post that Lucas didn't direct this movie. Richard Marquand directed the movie.

Was this some kind of macho trip? It's as if Lucas had to piss all over his movies to make them his again.

Which takes me to another thing that pisses me off about the whole Star Wars saga. Lucas has said he never intended to make a trilogy after Return of the Jedi. Actually, the new tree movies almost might not have happened:

Lucas said he only decided to do the back-story trilogy — which "Sith," due next May, will cap — because he realized he had already written it in order to tell the story in the first "Star Wars" films. "The original 'Star Wars' was only three films, and that was what it was meant to be," he said. "After a lot of pondering and thought, I went back to do the back story, but that pretty much tells the story. Episode six is the end. There isn't any more to it."

And it wasn't until today that it hit me why I've been so disappointed with the Star Wars movies after Revenge of the Sith : We will never get to see Carrie Fisher's Pricess Leia become a Jedi mistress.

That to me is the biggest failure with Lucas. He just couldn't identify with Leia enough to make her a completely developed and nuanced action-shero.

PS:
Yah. I know I'm a nerd so move along, nothing to see here.

PS(2):
Interesting psycho-demographical detail: My kids, who are 9 and 6 years-old were confounded by the Shaw appearance. They were expecting the younger Anakin.

Now, given how old the old Anakin looks, I have to say that casting Hayden for the third installment, instead of an older guy --let's say, another Danish-American actor-- would have made far greater sense in terms of chronology. Might have that Aragorn part spoiled the casting for Lucas? Who knows ... unless, of course, Lucas' "falling in love with" Hayden's performance has a whole different meaning.


***
liza's picture

| | | | | | | | | |

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1072 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Front-runners are usually focused on racing each other. They often do not realize that when people cannot decide between two leading candidates -- and it doesn't matter whether we are talking about politicians or consumer appliances -- our decision can be subtly swayed by whoever is in third place.

Psychologists call this the decoy effect: In a perfectly rational world, third candidates should only siphon votes away from one or both of the leading contenders. Under no circumstances should they cause the vote share of either front-runner to increase. In the actual world, however, third candidates regularly have the unintended effect of making one of the front-runners look better than before in the minds of undecided voters.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify