The Publisher
Liza Sabater
Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen
Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers
Daily Gotham
Feminist Bloggers
Network
BlogSheroes
A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling
Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog
Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.
I never said you shouldn't get paid
I said you can't charge for usage on the web the way you charge for magazines. I mean, seriously, this comment is ridiculous:
No, it's not the most sensible way. There is no way for image companies to assess eyeballs --or at least they are so behind the times they refuse to use good, sensible tactics like EMBED widgets to support claims like those.
The Clooney pic on this post is a chaff photograph that is not worth $150 dollars. Maybe $5 or $10. It's just an inocuous image of him coming out of an SUV. Sell these images just like iStockphoto --don't go for exclusivity but for volume.
Exclusives? Charge for those as you like for complete use of the image --and over a discounted version with an EMBED widget instead.
Photo companies claim with lawsuits like these that they are defending their copyright ---but have they really done all they can to protect it in the first place?
The answer? No.