 |
|
|
|
Visit our sponsorsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsMost EmailedVisit our sponsorsUpcoming events
 Who's onlineThere are currently 3 users and 1366 guests online.
Online users |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
|
Words to live by"I believe in a wall between church and state so high that no one can climb over it. "When religion controls government, political liberty dies; and when government controls religion, religious liberty perishes. "Every American has the constitutional right not to be taxed or have his tax money expended for the establishment of religion. "For too long the issue of government aid to church related organizations has been a divisive force in our society and in the Congress. It has erected communication barriers among our religions and fostered intolerance." Subscribe Buttons                    | |
It seems simple to me
My issue is very clear.
When a member of the Editorial Team of a Publication interacts in an aggressive or challenging fashion to fellow participants, or even more importantly brand new contributors with respect to their very first comment.....
Do we assume the comments are coming from the Editorial Position of the Publication, or just a personal view?
How do readers know the difference?
If we can clarify this, and the relevant responsibility of the Publication's staff, we will all be better off.