He was "fired", hee, hee, hee...

So,
I was visiting a blog I found while seeking and found more words about the CBS, radio personality, nappy haired ho fiasco.

The blogger was saying something to the effect of "Who would have known this man would have actually been fired. Usually, someone in the public eye would get a slap on the wrist along with some community hours or some cultural sensitivity training."

I commented saying something to the effect of:

"I don't think what happened to that radio announcer has anything to do with public outcry. This is the media we're talking about, remember? Their motives are often obscure and convoluted, yet always related to money and power...."

So, I'm trekking way outside the box because the view is always better out here. I'm doing stream of consciousness writing trying to free associate so that I can get a grasp of what has potentially happened here...very different to what has been presented for herd...I mean...public consumption.

I thought about attention. The media thrives off keeping the public interested in their product, not information, but confabulation.

"CBS has gotten a lot of attention out of this fiasco. It's been negative attention. But who knows what the actual purpose of this man's words were?"

So, I tried to add up some pieces.

"He was in their employ. Publicly, he's been fired. Does anyone know what they've chosen to do with him privately? Does anyone know what his severance package looks like? Does anyone know if this was part of a whole other project?"

Good questions. My answer?

"We just don't know. We know what CBS has shared. We know what the public outcry looked like."

Then, the lightbulb...

"Oh, I just realized...that sense of vindication. The exhilaration of millions knowing they had enough clout to move a media corp."

This is pivotal.

"The amerikkkan public has been saying for quite some time that the media is rigged, coopted that it doesn't reflect what actually goes on. People haven't been watching the news because they don't think the news is true.

Even more generally they've been loosing faith in corporations what with all the negative PRESS about evil, unethical corporations stealing from investors, poioning the land, raking in billions. There hasn't been any faith. But people have also been dejected and feeling too overtly controlled. They haven't felt like powerful citizens. And this means that they might not have been as interested in investing in societal charades created by the upper classes to keep the masses in check and invested in their own demise.

And now...ta-DA!

CBS "listens" to its public! In blogland, the big name bloggers are happy. The big name feminist and race bloggers are happy. They spread happy energy and hopeful stories about what this could mean for the future of citizen dissent. In realtime, the public is happy. And when amerikkkans are happy, they reinvest in corporations and in the state.

Blue pills for EVERYONE!

CBS stock is going to go through tha ROOF! Has anyone checked to see what their stock looked like before this fiasco and what it looks like now that they've "fired" this man? Sweet."


darkdaughta's picture



Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 874 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Words to live by

Famously opposed educators come together:

"Our macro-level differences do not interfere with our mutual respect for each other’s work.
That itself is something we hope our schools can help teach young people.

Our differences helped us consider ways to rethink our ideas and find places where those holding different views might compromise, and perhaps learn to live under one umbrella.

What we hope to model is the idea of democratic engagement, the notion that citizens need to think about and debate their beliefs and values with others who do not necessarily share all of them.

We want the issues connected to schooling to be a matter for discussion among all people who care.

We don’t have it in our power to solve the problems that confront American education—not those that take place within the schoolhouse, much less those that have a direct impact on children’s ability to learn, such as their unequal access to health care, housing, and myriad other life necessities.

But we hope that we have it in our power to provoke the thinking that must precede, accompany, and follow any attempt to reform—perhaps, even better, to transform—our schools."


Deborah Meier and Diane Ravitch May 24, 2006 commentary in EDUCATION WEEK


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify