Campaign Finance Rules

  •  (1) |
  • 1 (11) |
  • 2 (470) |
  • 4 (1) |
  • 5 (2) |
  • 9 (17) |
  • : (1) |
  • A (1557) |
  • B (1166) |
  • C (1893) |
  • D (1005) |
  • E (1258) |
  • F (812) |
  • G (725) |
  • H (1026) |
  • I (1029) |
  • J (515) |
  • K (115) |
  • L (624) |
  • M (1178) |
  • N (608) |
  • O (250) |
  • P (2010) |
  • Q (55) |
  • R (1315) |
  • S (1212) |
  • T (772) |
  • U (259) |
  • V (407) |
  • W (633) |
  • x (3) |
  • Y (39) |
  • Z (14) |

Rise of a new political beast of burden : The "unaffiliated" political promoter

It seems republicans have hatched a new kind of avertising political consultant : the "non-affiliaited" political advertiser. That's the kind of (usually) guy that manages to be throw away hundreds of thousands of dollars in "unaffiliated" advertising for the candidates of their choice.

First example up : Bob J. Perry liked so much his swiftboating of John Kerry that he is at it again:

A new television commercial that targets Democratic Senate ca didate Ned Lamont as a "tax-hiking liberal" is being aired by a tax-exempt adv cacy group funded by a major Republican donor from Texas who worked with White House political guru.

That funder, Bob J. Perry, also was the chief financial backer of Swift Boat Vets and POWs for Truth, another tax-exempt organization that attacked the reputation of U.S. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts in the 2004 presidential election.

Lest you dismiss this as an opportunity for the guy to bask in the Lamont glow, it seems he is targetting candidates supported by DailyKos : the guy is also throwing money for advertising against Patricia Madrid, who is in a tight race against the republican incumbent for New Mexico's CD-1, Heather Wilson.


liza's picture

| | | | | | | |

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1207 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Let's begin with capitalism, a word that has gone largely out of fashion. The approved reference now is to the market system. This shift minimizes --indeed, deletes-- the role of wealth in the economic and social system. And it sheds the adverse connotation going back to Marx. Instead of the owners of capital or their attendants in control, we have the admirably impersonal role of market forces. It would be hard to think of a change in terminology more in the interest of those to whom money accords power. They have now a functional anonymity.

But most of the people who use the new designation --economists, in particular-- are innocent as to the effect. They see nothing wrong with their bland, descriptive terminology. They pay no attention to the important question: Whether money "wealth" accords a special power. (It does.) Thus the term innocent fraud.


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify