carbon emissions

  •  (1) |
  • 1 (11) |
  • 2 (458) |
  • 4 (1) |
  • 5 (2) |
  • 9 (17) |
  • A (1544) |
  • B (1153) |
  • C (1882) |
  • D (998) |
  • E (1246) |
  • F (805) |
  • G (722) |
  • H (1012) |
  • I (1017) |
  • J (507) |
  • K (113) |
  • L (618) |
  • M (1172) |
  • N (606) |
  • O (249) |
  • P (2000) |
  • Q (53) |
  • R (1294) |
  • S (1200) |
  • T (767) |
  • U (259) |
  • V (402) |
  • W (625) |
  • x (3) |
  • Y (39) |
  • Z (14) |

NYC Among Best in the Nation on Greenhoue Gasses

In many ways NYC is a big mess. I thought that when I first moved here and I still think that. But both then and now I always recognized that NYC, in its own haphazard ways, sometimes gets it right.

Let's talk some greenhouse gas numbers. The United States is the single largest contributor to global warming. With only 5% of the earth's population we contribute 25% of the human-contributed greenhouse emissions. Per capita that pretty much sucks. Those conservatives who want to say population growth and China are the worst of the problem have to explain those numbers. Not that population growth and China aren't PART of the problem, but the USA is the biggest part of the problem.

According to Salon.com, NYC by itself contributes nearly 1% of America's emissions, making NYC an equivalent contributor to Ireland or Portugal.

Sounds bad, right? A single city contributing 1% of America's entire global emissions or .25% of the emissions of all humans on earth. But then you realize that NYC contains 2.7% of America's population. We in NYC produce only a little more than a third of the emissions as the average American.

So what are we doing right? Well, DUH! We have a mass transit system! Yes it's a chaotic, dirty mess, but it means we don't drive nearly as much as everyone else.

In the not too distant future I want to be working with our local Brooklyn New Democratic Majority group to host a series of talks on a "Green NYC." Among the topics I want to cover is how each individual residential building in NYC (or ANY city, for that matter) can reduce its carbon emissions and energy usage and save money in the process. This is an idea that is precolating among several minds in the city and may, within a few years, start to become mainstream. Let me use this as a chance to ask if anyone out there is interested in speaking in this series. Obviously you would have to be able to come to NYC to speak. We already have a couple of possible speakers and slots will be limited. Meetings are the second Thursday of every month, 7 PM at the Ozzie's on 5th Ave. and Garfield in Park Slope, Brooklyn. Not all meetings will cover "Green NYC," so again, slots will be limited. If we start intentionally greening NYC, we can save money for ourselves, reduce the pressure on the grid at peak times, thus reducing the risk of blackouts, and FURTHER reduce our per capita carbon emissions.


mole333's picture

| | | |

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1001 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Q Mr. President, there has been a bit of an international outcry over reports of secret U.S. prisons in Europe for terrorism suspects. Will you let the Red Cross have access to them? And do you agree with Vice President Cheney that the CIA should be exempt from legislation to ban torture?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Our country is at war, and our government has the obligation to protect the American people. The executive branch has the obligation to protect the American people; the legislative branch has the obligation to protect the American people. And we are aggressively doing that. We are finding terrorists and bringing them to justice. We are gathering information about where the terrorists may be hiding. We are trying to disrupt their plots and plans. Anything we do to that effort, to that end, in this effort, any activity we conduct, is within the law. We do not torture.


— George W. Bush


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify