habeas corpus

  •  (1) |
  • 1 (11) |
  • 2 (471) |
  • 4 (1) |
  • 5 (2) |
  • 9 (17) |
  • A (1557) |
  • B (1167) |
  • C (1894) |
  • D (1007) |
  • E (1259) |
  • F (812) |
  • G (725) |
  • H (1026) |
  • I (1029) |
  • J (516) |
  • K (115) |
  • L (626) |
  • M (1180) |
  • N (608) |
  • O (251) |
  • P (2013) |
  • Q (55) |
  • R (1315) |
  • S (1213) |
  • T (774) |
  • U (259) |
  • V (409) |
  • W (634) |
  • x (3) |
  • Y (39) |
  • Z (14) |

Ashes to Ashes

26

25

"…the Tableau is one of only two witch treatises that addressed the issue of witches as women. There were two aspects of their feminity which de Lancre emphasized in his discussion of witches: their sexuality…and women's 'natural inclination' for sorcery (de Lancre Tableau p. 89). This natural inclination was not rooted in women's physically weaker state. In fact, jurists such as Bodin had previously commented on having witnessed 'that women suffer torture more continuously than men' (de Lancre Tableau p. 89). Women's affinity for sorcery was based on women's extreme nature—her pursuit of her appetites, her desire for revenge, and her need for novelty, all distinguished her from the more balanced male."
Lorraine Berry, "Destabilizing Categories: Jews, Witches, and the Christian Male," Aestel 4 (1996)

Are we aware what lies at the end of the road opened up by the normalization of torture? A significant detail of Mr. Mohammed’s confession gives a hint. It was reported that the interrogators submitted to waterboarding and were able to endure it for less than 15 seconds on average before being ready to confess anything and everything. Mr. Mohammed, however, gained their grudging admiration by enduring it for two and a half minutes. "Knight of the Living Dead" By SLAVOJ ZIZEK


Lorraine's picture

| | | | |


Are You Happy Now, Congressman Arcuri??

Are you looking for something to do today? Would you like to send a letter to the newly elected Representative from NY's 24th? Michael Arcuri was elected in November, 2006 to represent the NY 24th. He's a Democrat, the former prosecutor for Utica.

He's got a lot of positions that I like, and some folks may consider him a liberal. Except. When he was asked at campaign stops about HR 6166--the torture bill, he said that if he had been in Congress, he would have supported it.

In other words, Mr. Arcuri is not a big fan of the ancient principle of habeas corpus. It leaves me a bit troubled, does this. It's not some small inconsistency that's the hobgoblin of little minds; to me, it's a giant inconsistency that makes me wonder what other rights Mr. Arcuri believes to be expendable in the "war on terror."

Today, The US Court of Appeals denied the right of detainees at Guantanamo to have their cases reviewed by civilian courts. The US Court of Appeals wrote that habeas corpus does not apply to aliens held on US soil. You can read the judgment here in PDF--all 59 pages of it.

Then, if you like, you can drop Congressman Arcuri an e-mail here. Just ask him what exactly he thinks of this ruling.


Lorraine's picture

| | | |


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 865 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

I am a First Amendment absolutist and I would like to read, amid the discussion of how the Delete key should be wielded, some more nuanced discusssion than I have seen on just where anyone believes the line should be drawn in censoring the Web, blogs or any other speech.

Certainly the words and images directed at Kathy are hateful and abhorrent. If a law has been broken, the accused should be prosecuted. Let's do keep in mind, however, that that person is the one who created and posted the words and images.

Beyond that, I don't see what can or should be done publicly. In case anyone hasn't noticed, anonymous abusers are not the sort of people who "own their words." There are bad people in the world. They do bad things. Bad things happen to good people.

And it multiplies the violation when good people respond in kind.


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify