Katie Couric

  •  (1) |
  • 1 (13) |
  • 2 (510) |
  • 4 (1) |
  • 5 (2) |
  • 9 (17) |
  • A (1575) |
  • B (1201) |
  • C (1943) |
  • D (1047) |
  • E (1356) |
  • F (827) |
  • G (754) |
  • H (1056) |
  • I (1062) |
  • J (559) |
  • K (125) |
  • L (643) |
  • M (1219) |
  • N (632) |
  • O (263) |
  • P (2054) |
  • Q (55) |
  • R (1350) |
  • S (1252) |
  • T (797) |
  • U (262) |
  • V (437) |
  • W (668) |
  • x (3) |
  • Y (42) |
  • Z (14) |

"Sarah Palin and the rape kits" is not a punk rock band (but it explains her interview with Katie Couric)


Skepticism about Palin has been growing and for a good reason.

I've watched the segment where Sarah Palin talks about Roe vs. Wade and I have to tell you, I think it is one of the most insightful commentaries to come out of her mouth. I think she did a really good job at sounding level headed.

Yet listen to it very closely and what you can hear is an extremist taking her political views for a little mainstream spin and, fortunately for us, coming short.

So let me back track here a bit and go back to and issue that popped up a few weeks ago : Under then Mayor Palin, Wassilla was one of a handful of cities in Alaska that charged victims for rape kits. And what has been most astounding about this policy is Palin's response to the allegations : She claims to have not know about the practice. This from a woman that was voted into office in Wassilla by less than 7,000 votes.


liza's picture

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |


How can I forget this : McCain babysits Palin during Katie Couric's interview


There was a hysterical moment during The Situation Room. Blitzer asked Gergen what did he think of McCain's appearance and defense during this second "interview" between McCain and Palin. He was dumbfounded. It was awesome!

Gergen didn't have a response and said just that. Afterwards, Roland Martin and the othersagreed that the interview was an embarrassment. It wasn't because of Katie Couric's behaviour. The woman has struck gold with these Palin interviews. It was the patriarchal and condescending nature of McCain's appearance.

Which takes me to disagree with Maegan's comment about this interview : Couric couldn't smack Palin about her feminism because Palin has none. 


liza's picture

| | | | | | |


C is for Cookie, That's Good Enough for Me!

C is also for Couric and Clinton, and that, apparently, is good enough for Rebecca Dana. It’s not often that one reads in Slate something that looks like an elementary school assignment, but today’s the day. Dana’s “write a compare and contrast article about two famous women for International Women’s Day assignment” has netted us, “The KatieShow: Does Couric’s rocky start at CBS spell trouble for Hillary Clinton?”

The bases for the comparison:

But they've both staked claims in the same middle ground, taking pains to appear strong but not mannish, ballsy yet maternal. Both are bottle blondes (perhaps in an effort to mute their tough streaks). Both have gone on "listening tours" around the country, have undergone ambitious style makeovers, have opened their private lives to public scrutiny. And Couric and Clinton also share the occasional counsel of Matthew Hiltzik, a major New York City publicist who specializes in managing the public images of powerful and difficult women. (Despite these efforts, Couric and Clinton still ruffle feathers: Both are subjects of unauthorized biographies by Ed Klein, neither our era's greatest feminist nor our greatest historian, but a man with good taste in material.)


Lorraine's picture

| | | | | |


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 828 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Words to live by

They dance and strip for free while some jerk-off makes a fortune selling videos of them. Looking dumbfounded when she learned that the girls don't get paid for their exposure, Oprah remarked, "Okay, that really is stupid." No kidding.

But, wait! It gets worse. It is not just that women are exploiting their bodies "for free", they are forking out tons of money to look like all the women they see on television. Oprah had four teenagers from Florida on the show. These young girls spend thousands of dollars to imitate celebrity styles and one is already planning on getting breast implants. Are these young women just a rare exception? Come on. Who hasn't spent a ridiculous amount of money on highlights, or bikini waxes, or some other please-make-me-be-sexy type thing?

We are literally buying into our oppression. People are profiting off the exploitation of girls and women, and then taking our money as we each try to add up to the narrow formula of sexy that bombards us.


— Polly Jones, blogger
Marginal Notes: Stupid Girls, Big Bucks


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify