No Dog Left Behind

No Dog Left Behind

NYT's Sandy Huffaker and Amy Gunderson in "What's the Thread Count on My Dog's Bed?" forecast the next school-and-socialization frontier after universal preschool:

The W San Diego started pet-friendly cocktail hours in the fall and the Hotel Helix in Washington is starting one this summer. The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort in Naples starts obedience classes this summer including a socialization class for puppies 10 weeks to 5 months old.

And the Loews Coronado Bay Resort in San Diego offers dog surfing classes. Yes, surfing. The hotel rolled out a $300 package this spring that includes one night's accommodation, a surfing lesson for the dog (but not the owner), a meal for the pet, and board shorts (seriously) for smaller dogs.

"We have sold close to 40 of those packages," said Anne Stephany, the public relations manager for the Loews Coronado Bay. . .


JJ Ross's picture

| | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
JJ Ross's picture

Lessons for Us Animals

Amy Sutherland is the author of "Kicked, Bitten and Scratched: Life and Lessons at the Premier School for Exotic Animal Trainers" (Viking, June 2006).

Her take on behavior modification as everything we need to know about domestic human lessons is Skinnerian for sure, but at least it beats the horsewhip training mentality in the Pearl "To Train Up a Child" books!

June 25, 2006
Modern Love:
What Shamu Taught Me About a Happy Marriage
By AMY SUTHERLAND

Besides the author's NYT column on home education of husbands as exotic animals, see an excerpted chapter at author's NPR interview link and see if you can tell the human student training from their animal training, here's a teaser:

"What follows is a ribald beauty pageant of beasts that breaks all the rules of a proper animal education presentation. They even have the animals do tricks, a forbidden word among enlightened trainers, who prefer 'behaviors' instead. . .

As an alum puts it, the school " pretty much owns you.. .Students will follow a list of rules worthy of the Marines."


JJ Ross's picture

Pups and Cubs Learn From Play

not canine curriculum prepared by commercial contract with puppy mills and sold to some Dog-Eat-Dog Congress as profitable education.
Some kids are that lucky still, to have engaged parents who let them learn from authentic play, rather than schooling them for sheer survival using obstacle course training.

By the time they reach an age to think about what they'd like to do, most kids have been thoroughly misled about the idea of loving one's work. School has trained them to regard work as an unpleasant duty. . .

Surfing classes for spotted hounds, never mind status-signaling doggy dress or kitty strollers seem to be going in in a new but nevertheless ominous direction, not toward developing the next generation in any productive way, or even letting them all play until they grow into their public lives, but instead toward some demeaning dog-as-plaything indulgence of classless and extravagantly stupid human masters.

OTOH - it's a delightful image all by itself; my children adore it and don't see any spectre of education politics in it, thank goodness! Never having suffered the loss of self-directed play, everything is fun for them, and they cheerfully bounce along like dogs out for an unleashed stroll (not in a cat stroller!) and are almost never hang-dog (cynical or defeatist) even in the face of disaster.

I do believe this comes from a life of well-protected play and preserved curiosity about the world, and maybe it IS a form of behavioral conditioning - the kind that creates happy do-it-yourself confidence, rather than some counterproductive, passive-aggressive fear response to all trainers, teachers and bosses.

I'd put a high premium on self-reliant yet socially responsible technology, schedules, lifestyles, networking, world views and income generation. The kinds of learning based on intrinsic motivation, privacy and sustainability, learning that doesn't require or prepare people to live and work in assigned dorms and barracks under constant public supervision and scrutiny.

. . .I think our kids need to learn differently and do differently, SO much better than we did and so far past school. Someday soon they'll replace us as thinkers, caregivers, problem-solvers, diplomats, designers, and story-tellers. (If they survive!)

If we really expect public education to help save every dog and a happy world for us all to share, then public support of private exploration and play in every pup's home environment would come much closer to creating the reality, than ridiculous resort surfing lessons for the elite, while the nation's puppy mill overruns are left to scrounge kibble off the floor of society's dog-pound schools. . .

How about "No Dog Dragged Outta Bed for Abuse" before we get to "No Dog Left Without a Surfboard?"


liza's picture

You noticed that too?

You know what I saw the other day in my neighborhood? A woman walking a cat in a baby stroller --I KID YOU NOT ... and all pun intended.

WTF!?!?!


JJ Ross's picture

Socializing pups

is already what school is about -- we say so openly and think nothing of it, even criticize parents who don't give kids enough negative socialization experiences early enough (getting bullied by teachers and peers, accused unjustly, losing at sports, etc)

We've already made the kids "accountable" to society and we already refuse to license them for participatory citizenship if they don't measure up to our obedience training, mastering every trick from a list of thousands.

So, we're not that far from school as "animal obedience training center" as the next compulsory public school reform. When I was a kid we actually had "reform schools" and that's what it meant, mandatory socialization and obedience training imposed by certified trainers (after their own training is complete, of course) --


JJ Ross's picture

Head Animal Trainer Accuses Unjustly!

If young, bright, curious humans and animals make you smile, this news will make you scowl at what one school principal can do to hurt them in the name of educating them. It puts the "public education" rhetoric propping up such state-supported cruelty in a harshly real light too, imo.

School policy was my main field, the part of my profession about which I was most passionate to the end. Reading this nightmarish story about policy as weapon of mass destruction makes me feel like Oppenheimer seeing the horror of his life's work misused and being discredited by peers and establishment for speaking against the righteous wrongness of Schoolthink -- which like Oppenheimer's time, in this case seems to be: this is war, if they hate you you must be right, blindly following orders, get them before they get us, etc.

I suggest if that's how you see dogs and children, as dangerous beasts to be broken by fearless and heartless trainer-warrior leaders, you should:
a) shut up about education issues period, and
b) never be allowed near animals OR children of any kind, much less become a parent, principal or pet owner. In fact, maybe we should just lock YOU up for your own good, and ours . .


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Poll

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1358 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

"Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the U. S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them, and these are to be paid out of the national taxes. Does this not involve the principle of a national establishment...?"


— -- James Madison, "Essay on Monopolies" unpublished until 1946, cited in Brant, Irving, The Bill of Rights, 1965, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify