Sandra Day O'Connor: You can't say I didn't Warn You
Dear Sandra,
I don't mean to rub it in, but I bet you're wishing you had paid attention to that open letter I wrote you a few years ago. This week, a report on channel KPNX leaked that your Alzheimer's-stricken husband John is living, happily, with a new girlfriend in an old age home. Their video exposé even contains hard-core shots of your husband John holding hands with Kay, the local hooch of the Huger Mercy Living Center. Far from being jealous or upset, you, according to your own son, are a bit of a voyeur who likes to watch: "For Mom to visit when he's happy ... visiting with his girlfriend, sitting on the porch swing holding hands... No stress on mom. No guilt laid on mom."
Well I'm glad you enjoy watching your husband and his lady friend "exchange oxygen masks" and play footsie under the Bingo table. And I'm glad that you don't feel guilty about your John. But I still haven't forgiven you for what you did to me and, more importantly, what you did to America. And that is something to feel guilty about.
Liberals were so busy pointing their fingers at Alito and Roberts for shifting the court to the right they forget to look at the bigger question: How did Alito and Roberts get there? By replacing Rehnquist and O'Connor, respectively, on the bench. We can hardly blame Rehnquist, or as Nixon liked to call him, " Renchburg" the "Jewish clown". I mean Rehnquist could barely walk, couldn't talk, and had a gaping hole in his throat, which he covered ingeniously with his signature "tracheo-scarf." And yet this judge chugged away on decision after decision until the day he died at the age of 81.
You, Sandra, (you never got back to me when I asked you if I could call you Sandra, so I'm going to take that negative as a yes) retired at the age of 75 so you could take care of your husband. In my open letter to you (which I know you must have read or at the very least heard about because, I mean I published it on my blog, which is HUGE) I tried to warned you
I know you stepped down to spend more time with your husband who has Alzheimer's. Now Sandra, my grandmother had Alzheimer's, so I speak from the heart and mean no disrespect when I say that your husband isn't going to notice that you're spending more time with him. The country, however, is going to notice your absence.
Like so many prophets before me, I was ignored, dismissed, silenced. I have been vindicated by political and, now, personal events. Of course Sandra, if only you had listened to me you could have stayed on the bench and hired someone else to take care of your husband. At the time, I suggested hiring someone like Harriett Myers, who was looking for a job anyway. Now I realize you could have brought him to the loving lips of Kay who was on the prowl for a new BMONC (Big Man on Nursing Home Campus).
Of course, if you hadn't given away the election to Bush, you could have retired back in 2000 and had nothing to feel guilty about. The good news for you is that your husband and Kay are past child bearing age, so at least when your your replacement helps overturn Roe v. Wade, you won't have to worry about the happy couple forgetting to use a condom.
Write back Sandy!
Love,
me
Abortion | Alzheimer's | Health | Humor | Justice | Law | Reproductive Rights | John Roberts | Roe v. Wade | Samuel Alito | Sandra Day O'Connor | United States Supreme Court
You and LaShawn Barber drive me fucking nuts
How in the world are state-rights good for colored people? HELLO! Slavery anybody?
Geezus effing crickes.
How in the world is a strong
How in the world is a strong judiciary good for colored people? HELLO! Dred Scott anybody?
Geezus effing crickes.
We can go back and forth all day if you like.
It was the Supreme Court which enhanced the rights of slaveowners in the Dred Scott case and it was elected officials — the President and Congress — who abolished slavery.
With everything else being equal, I'd rather moral issues be settled by the Democratic process than by 9 unelected judges - Democrats, on the other hand, seem to want the opposite.
Hispanic Pundit
http://www.HispanicPundit.com/
With all due respect...
I would say that Ms. O'Connor has a right to determine when and why she retires and shouldn't be made to feel as if she is solely responsible for the fate of the abortion rights issue, let alone the entire nation. There is no way anyone can possibly know what is in the minds of people, even the most public of figures like Ms. O'Connor; why excoriate her now in what may be the most difficult time of her life? She's done her duty to the country -- let her live out the rest of her life in peace, and let us concentrate on getting the current Prez out of the White House so that we can get some real progressive issues out in the collective consciousness of the nation.
By the way, I discovered your blog when I viewed an archived video of the panel discussion on blogging and feminism held at Barnard (?) last year. Great blog!!! Always great to see powerful, articulate women of color taking their rightful place in the blogosphere, especially in the relatively male-dominated discussions on politics and social issues.
Cheers,
Marjorie































On the contrary, I think
On the contrary, I think O'Conner did the country a big favor...I am very happy with Roberts and Alito.
Btw, overturning Roe vs. Wade will not make abortion illegal, all it would do is make abortion a states right issue...and, more importantly, an issue tied to the will of the people instead of some judges. A better scenario, IMHO.
Hispanic Pundit
http://www.HispanicPundit.com/