Condoleeza Rice is running for President of the United States

Bob Fertik gives us the 411 on John Negroponte's demotion from Director of the National Intelligence Department to Condoleeza Rice's deputy at the State Department [Liza's Note : This article has been reprinted with permission by the author] :





Condi for President
Bob Fertik
First reprinted at Democrats.com

Everyone is trying to figure out why John Negroponte would take a demotion from Director of National Intelligence - overseeing 16 intelligence agencies with an unlimited budget and zero oversight - to become Condi's #2 at the State Department, which gets as much respect (and funding) under Bush as the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

There's a very simple reason: Karl Rove has chosen Condi Rice to run for President , and he needs to line up her replacement so she can resign in March to begin her campaign - before she has to answer subpoenas from Joe Biden.

You read it here first.

The idea of running Condi isn't new; Dick "Toesucker" Morris wrote a book about it , and talks about it all the time on FOX.

Many believe that the White House is Hillary's to lose, but as longtime strategists Dick Morris and Eileen McGann explain in Condi vs. Hillary, the former first lady's bid for the Oval Office is vulnerable to a challenge from a most unexpected quarter: the Bush administration's brilliant and charismatic secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice.

Of course, Condi has insisted repeatedly that she would never run for President - because she knew she could never beat Hillary, despite Toesucker's wet dreams.

But that was before the great Republican meltdown of 2006, before Hillary moved ahead of Republicans in the polls, and before Obamamania unleashed a powerful force that, when hitched to Hillary's wagon as VP, could be the most powerful Democratic ticket in a generation.

Led entirely by discredited angry white men, the GOP is on the brink of extinction, and there is no one who can ride in on a white horse to save them.

Rudy Giuliani? If Bernie Kerik doesn't bring him down, ex-wife Donna Hanover will - just read Rudy's own secret memo.

John McCain? The champion of the "surge" will be blamed personally for every U.S. soldier who is killed between now and Election Day 2008. As John Edwards told George Stephanopoulos, it's the "McCain Doctrine."

Newt Gingrich? He led the "Republican Revolution" that became thoroughly corrupt and was thoroughly rejected by voters - including many angry conservatives - last November. And, like Rudy, he has a few bitter ex-wives too.

Mitt Romney? He was for abortion rights before he was against it. He was for gay marriage before he was against it. And what will Virgil Goode say about a candidate who would swear his oath of office on the Book of Mormon?

So who can save the GOP? Until 2000, the only Republican with appeal beyond the GOP base was Colin Powell. But he lost all credibility when he sold the full package of Bush-Cheney Iraq War Lies to the world at the U.N. As Bush once said, "Fool me twice ... you can't get fooled again!"

There is no one left on the Republican bench. The GOP needs a "Hail Mary" pass.

Hail Condi, the GOP's great black hope.


liza's picture

| | | | | | | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Teacher With a Tude's picture

Oh, the irony

The most bitter of ironies if the Republican party were to manage to be first to get a woman AND an African-American into office.


mole333's picture

Could be interesting

Of course it is already ironic that the Democratic Party now generally trumps the party of Lincoln in terms of civil rights...

It would be a VERY interesting scenario if Rice and Hillary both got their respective nominations. Wouldn't THAT be a huge change. The good-old-boy vote would have to go third party...Reform Party? Libertarian Party?

I have a gut feeling neither Clinton nor Rice will get the nomination. Hard to say at this point though.


Tara Parks's picture

oh, this would be so ironic!

oh, this would be so ironic! but i don't think it will happen. and i would be surprised if Clinton got it; she can't win the south.


section9's picture

As a Republican, I have to interject....

A couple of things for the local Crats on this board.

Condi is hugely popular among the rank and file. You people hate her guts because she works for Bush, but she's popular in the country.

Two: Rudy is very popular as well; as is Mitt, but people are seeing his support of bans on gay marriage, etc. for the opporunism that it actually is. The base doesn't quite trust JMC.

I know this is a hard thing to conceive, but something else is being planned, I think, which is far more ingenious than anyone here, or at that goober Bob Fertik's site could begin to think of.

Condi likes to hide the fact that she has an IQ in the 180's. That way, all of you people think she is stupid.

Should be fun to watch.


mole333's picture

Odd...

It is odd that you phrase things this way. I for one said it would be great to see something like a Rice/Clinton fight. No one said Rice was dumb...one of the architects of an insanely failed foreign policy that has let terrorists go free and gotten us into a quagmire. But not personally dumb. We reserve THAT accusation for her boss.

You ignore the fact that we are well aware that we aren't going to like WHOEVER the Republicans pick. Of all the possibilities, I'd probably prefer Rice over any other choice. If she DID become president, she would be more like Bush's father than like Bush himself. It would also be historic in a way that almost every liberal would be proud to witness even if we disagreed with her extensively.

If Republicans choose Rice, more power to them. I will still oppose her, but it would be a far, far better choice than some of the other choices Republicans have made.


JJ Ross's picture

Methinks you Kitchen folk

Methinks you Kitchen folk have some pretty peculiar ideas about the South.

As long as Bill Clinton lives and breathes and bites his lip, and she stays with him, she IS Southern . . .


JJ Ross's picture

Of Course Condi Is Too

. . .southern, I mean, not with Bill. Smiling

Since we can't even define what the verb "count" or the adjective "legal" or the noun "vote" means, why speculate about what it means to be female and southern?
(Hint - I too am female and southern but have little else in common with these two nor they with each other, except brains used to get terminal degrees . . .
I have no clue what any of that would mean and I challenge anyone who believes she (or he)does!

Come to think of it, we all have one other thing in common, each having had our sexual orientation suspected from time to time . . .


mole333's picture

Who are you talking to?

I'm the guy who advocates leaving no state behind. 50 State strategy and all that. Focused on Virginia in 2005 and 2006. Pushed Christine Jennings in he blogs. I know full well the South can be fine. Carter, Clinton, Gore. Not to mention Ann Richards.

And great BBQ!


JJ Ross's picture

HA! The Pig and Whistle

My South Carolinian folks were coy collegiate cut-ups at a famous Georgia BBQ nirvana-on-a-bun spot called the Pig and Whistle. . .here in north Florida we frequent JB's, but we have to drive across the state line to do it! Smiling


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1251 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] ... it is declared ... that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries....

"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation."


— -- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams (the original language is by Joel Barlow, U.S. Consul)


Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify