Four things you need to know about Ernesto Guevara before watching Benicio del Toro as "Ché"

Last night I had the good fortune to see both "El Argentino" and "Guerrilla", the Benicio del Toro obsession directed by Steven Soderbergh and co-produced with Laura Bickford. I actually had a wonderful time sitting through the 4 1/2 hours of the movie but found myself bothered by some of the things that jumped at me for their absence.

It's probably why I found myself spending too much time on this preface.

So let's have it as a whole separate post because I believe there's quite a bit of background that is needed before going to see the movies.

Benicio cannot help but play Ché Guevara "larger than life"

Ché Guevara was a half an inch shy of being 6 feet tall. Due to his asthma he carried himself with a bit of a hunch that made him look much shorter than Fidel Castro who is a mountain of a man at 6'3".

The photograph I've appended to this section is the exception to the rule of most photos with Ché and Fidel together. Search for images under "Fidel and Che" and you will notice in most of the photographs this height difference was never, ever played up. Actually, in many photographs with Castro, Ché was always positioned to look the same height.

This is important because Benicio del Toro is 6'2" tall. To those of us who grew up with the vivid myths of "La Revolución Cubana" in América Latina (and yes, that includes Puerto Rico), Benicio by default is playing a Ché that is larger than life.

Guevara was a sexy motherfrucker --and Benicio was born to play him:

Over at the Internet Movie Database one commenter wrote : I wonder how iconic he would have become if he'd looked like Bob Hoskins or Danny De Vito. Truer words couldn't have been written.

I knew people who met Ché in the flesh and they'd all say that he had that "It factor" that celebrities are made of. Allegedly photography nor film did justice to Ché's incredibly good looks. He was a hunk with capital H and one who tried very hard to keep it in check.

Exactly like Benicio del Toro, by the way. 

And just as with Benicio, the harder Ché tried fight his good looks and natural attractiveness,  the more people swooned around him. Check out this interview on Oprah to see what I mean. Benicio is not even trying and even Oprah is losing her shit.

Fidel Castro knew this about El Ché and historical gossip has it that he hated that aspect of Ernesto Guevara. Whereas Ché would walk into a room and leave everybody breathless, Fidel had to work really hard at being liked. It wasn't that either weren't nerds. They were. Yet Ché was the incredibly good looking nerd.

And, mind you, Fidel Castro is known to be a flirt and a social butterfly. The thing is that he had to work hard at it whereas Ché's looks and natural charisma were the thing of legend --and when combined with his smile, the perfect weapon of mass seduction.

There's always Ché and Camilo ... and then Fidel :

Bienvenido Fidel

The relationship between Ché Guevara and Camilo Cienfuegos is also the thing of legend. They were so close that Ernesto ended up naming one of his sons Camilo. They were so close that it's known that this was another thing that Fidel hated about "el Argentino".

It's important to know that Fidel Castro had an ambivalent relationship with many of his cohorts but particularly with Ché and Camilo. They skyrocketed in glory inside and outside of Cuba as the faces of the moral, ethical and even aesthetic reasons for "La Revolución" whereas Castro was always looked at as the political mastermind ---and Fidel hated politicians. It's why he hated not being considered one of the cool guys when compared to Camilo and el Ché.

There are many speculations about whether Camilo Cienfuegos died in an airplane accident or whether his plane was disappeared with the help of Fidel. This is important to know because Guevara mourned his friend terribly. His mourning is considered the "trigger" for his own temporary disappearance and later re-emergence as the globe-trotting guerrillero that ends up betrayed by the very people he was supposed to liberate in Bolivia.

Ché was indeed a lover

This photo of Guevara's wedding with Aleida March is actually one of my most favorite photographs of el Ché. Look at that posture and that face : It tells you all what you need to know about the man being caught with his guard down by love.

In "Evocación", Aleida March talks about the oddly shy courtship they had right smack in the middle of the war against the Batista government. She describes a Ché who basically is desperately in love, having found his soul mate in a guerrillera.

It's a portrait that is at odds with the hero warrior and ruthless enforcer, but that is very telling of the man. He had 4 kids with Aleida but never neglected the daughter he had with his first wife Hilda Gadea. Actually, some of the most tender photographs of el Ché have him posing with ether his children or children from the places that knew him as "El Comandante". He was a loving daddy at heart.

And then, there's poems like the one he wrote to Aleida, as a last good-bye on his way to Bolivia:

Adios, mi única, no tiembles ante el hambre de los lobos
ni en el frío estepario de la ausencia
del lado del corazón te llevo
y juntos seguiremos hasta que la ruta se esfume.
Y agregaría que mi soledad se llenará de tus recuerdos.
Amaré en silencio.

(Nota bene : The following is my quick translation.)

Good bye, my one and only,
do not tremble before the hunger of wolves
nor in the siberian cold of my absence;
for right next to my heart I will take you with me
and together we will continue until the end of the road.
And let me add that my loneliness will be filled with my memories of you.
In silence, I will love.

You know the measure of a man by the way he loves his woman and cares for his children. The tender hugging, the kiss on the neck, the voracious looks, everything adds a whole different dimension to a man. Especially with men who like Guevara, lived to be a "man's man".  It's important to know how "a man loves woman" because it gives us a different side to the kind of guy for whom virility was taken to be an expression of their commitment to the revolution and for whom machismo was a natural by-product of a soul constantly at war.

These are the things you need to remember about El Ché because, unfortunately, they're little specs of insight that flash through the screen in "El Argentino" and "Guerrilla" but are never fully realized. A pity, because that's the Ché a lot of us were eager to see Benicio bring to life on the big screen.

And yet,  they are films you must absolutely see. My review is next with the whys.

http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/four_things_you_need_to_know_about_ernesto_guevara
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
No votes yet
About author

Liza Sabater is the founding blogger and publisher of culturekitchen and Daily Gotham. She also a new media producer and social technologist with 10 years experience. You can reach her at blogdiva [at] culturekitchen.com or follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/blogdiva

liza's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mrme's picture

Che

What is it about a mass-murdering communist that you find so attractive?

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Evidence?

I am no fan of communism (I see not one communist nation appealing, whether Soviet, Chinese or North Korean version, any more than I find the perfect libertarian nations like Somalia appealing). So I differ with Guevara there. I am an FDR style capitalist myself.

But what "mass murder" are you referring to? I can find only two possible bases for your accusation: Guevara was known to execute deserters during the Cuban revolution, and his role as commander of the La Cabaña Fortress prison where executions took place. I would perhaps call him oppressive in these, but not sure "mass murder" is accurate unless you also consider the death penalty in the US to be "mass murder." I don't know about the judicial process, if any, used in executing deserters. But here is what wiki has to say about Guevara's role in the La Cabaña Fortress prison:

During the rebellion against Batista's dictatorship, the general command of the rebel army, led by Fidel Castro, introduced into the liberated territories the 19th-century penal law commonly known as the Ley de la Sierra.[50] This law included the death penalty for extremely serious crimes, whether perpetrated by the dictatorship or by supporters of the revolution. In 1959, the revolutionary government extended its application to the whole of the republic and to war criminals captured and tried after the revolution. According to the Cuban Ministry of Justice, this latter extension supported by the majority of the population, followed the same procedure as those in the Nuremberg Trials held by the Allies after World War II.[51] To implement this plan, Castro named Guevara commander of the La Cabaña Fortress prison, for a five-month tenure (January 2 through June 12, 1959).[52] Guevara was charged with purging the Batista army and consolidating victory by exacting "revolutionary justice" against traitors, chivatos, and Batista's war criminals.[53] Serving in the post as commander of La Cabaña, Guevara reviewed the appeals of those convicted during the revolutionary tribunal process.[54] On some occasions the penalty delivered by the tribunal was death by firing squad.[55] Raúl Gómez Treto, senior legal advisor to the Cuban Ministry of Justice, considered removing restrictions on the death penalty to be justified in order to prevent citizens themselves from taking justice into their own hands.[56] With 20,000 Cubans estimated to have been murdered at the hands of Batista's accomplices,[57] and a survey at the time showing 93% public approval for the tribunal process,[58] the newly empowered Cuban government along with Guevara concurred. Although the exact numbers differ, it is estimated that several hundred people were executed during this time.[59]

I am not in a position to judge their process, but if it really was based on the Nuremberg trials and was used mainly to prosecute those Batista loyalists who were responsible for 20,000 deaths (now THAT is mass murder), then it sounds like it has at least as much, if not more, claim to being due process than our actions in Guantanamo.

So are you talking about some other aspect of Guevara's career? Because if you are referring to these incidents, it seems you are also condemning a great deal of what the US does as "mass murder" because we ran the Nuremberg trials and we also have a death penalty. Again, I am not really a fan of communism and Che Guevara's popularity on the left seemed a bit cultish to me, so I am not defending him. But your statement seems overblown.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
liza's picture

At least he didn't have the pretense of "defending democracy"

Like the mass murderers known as George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld and Alberto Gonzáles.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
HispanicPundit's picture

disregard

disregard

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
HispanicPundit's picture

A Pinochet Movie Would Have Been Better

A movie about Chile's Pinochet would have been alot better...atleast then, it would be somebody much more worthy of our admiration.

Hispanic Pundit
http://www.HispanicPundit.com/

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Snark and mass murder

I can only hope this is snark. But then again it can bring us back to the mass murder question that came up earlier.

Batista's forces were accused of killing 20,000. Che Geuvara has been accused of killing hundreds. From what I can find about Pinochet:

The Rettig Report concluded that 2,279 persons who disappeared during the military government were killed for political reasons, and approximately 30,000 tortured according to the later Valech Report, while several thousand were exiled.

Looking ONLY at those killed, Che Guevara seems the meekest, followed by Pinochet's few thousand, followed by Batista's tens of thousands. In each case it was considered "necessary" to commit these executions. Torture might raise Pinochet up in the ranks of nasty dictators, though. Thirty thousand is a lot of torture, going way beyond Guantanamo. I didn't find accusations of torture against Guevara, only hundreds of executions. In all, Batista seems among the worst of Latin American dictators, Pinochet a wanabe Batista, and Che relatively meek when looking at their respective brutality.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
HispanicPundit's picture

Che Vs Pinochet

Without splitting hairs here, Che is accredited with killing roughly the same amount of people as Pinochet is. In addition to killings, he also, "presided over the Cuban Revolution's first firing squads. He founded Cuba's "labor camp" system—the system that was eventually employed to incarcerate gays, dissidents, and AIDS victims."

More importantly though, other fundamental differences are the type of people each killed. Even if you can make the argument that Pinochet killed a few hundred more people than Che, atleast Pinochet directed his killings at communists (Remember them? The people who are responsible for more innocent deaths than Nazi's!), whereas Che directed his killings at Democratic reformers and capitalists (the good guys!).

Lastly, atleast Pinochet left Chile with a strong economy. In fact, the differences couldn't be more stark: Cuba today, to a large degree precisely because of Che, is one of the poorest countries in Latin America...contrast that to Chile, which today, again to a large degree precisely because of Pinochet, is one of the richest countries in Latin America.

Personally, I despise all dictators, but if I was going to wear a shirt glorifying one, I wouldn't pick the totalitarian dictator Che, I'd wear a Pinochet shirt...he was the far more admirable one of the two. More on this here.

Hispanic Pundit
http://www.HispanicPundit.com/

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Well

Well, I am certainly not going to defend Che or communism. But I don't really think defending Pinochet because he was good for the economy really holds water. I guess I have two objections. First, you excuse Pinochet because he only killed "communists" as if that inherently makes someone worthy of killing. I don't agree with communism as an economic system, but to imply that somehow it isn't as big a deal killing someone who believes in communism seems just a little bit disgusting to me. My grandmother's second husband was a communist. I never knew him, but does that make him worthy of death in your eyes? Would that make my grandmother guilty by association? I would also add to this point that a.) Che's excuses for his use of the death penalty was that they were Batistaists, not democratic reformers, and b.) Pinochet's definition of "communist" seemed to include democratic reformers as well. Personally I figure BOTH were more than willing to kill anyone they damned well pleased and Pinochet is in no way better than Che in that respect.

My second point would be there is no way to justify a brutal, totalitarian dictatorship (EITHER left or right) just by saying "it's good for the ecnoomy." One aspect of Hitler's rise to power was, of course, that he got Germany out of the horrible economic collapse of the Weimar Republic days. Soooo, by your definition Hitler wasn't all that bad because he improved the German economy...though I am sure you wouldn't wear his T-shirt. I would add that the alliance among Italy, Germany and Japan was specifically an anti-communist one, an alliance that right wing Americans like Herbert Hoover, Douglas MacArthur and Charles Lindbergh wanted America to join. So what level of comfort would YOU have had with joining that alliance against Stalin? Would you have chosen siding with the Nazis over the Soviet Union? From your defense (luke warm though it was) of Pinochet, it sounds like you would.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
HispanicPundit's picture

Couple of clarifications on

Couple of clarifications on my part.

First, I am not defending Pinochet in isolation. Personally, I hate all dictators, Pinochet included. What I am doing is defending Pinochet compared to Che. In other words, if you are going to admire a dictator, Pinochet is the better choice.

Second, I didn't say that a belief in communism makes one "worthy of killing". I said that killing communists is 'less evil' than killing Democratic reformers or capitalists. It's really no different than saying killing Nazi's is less evil than say killing Catholics or Jews. Of course nobody should be killed for their beliefs...but in this case we don't have that choice. We have to pick between two dictators, one who killed Democratic reformers and capitalists and one who killed communists...I prefer Pinochet, precisely because he killed history's bad guys, communists. Again, not because what he did was good...but because what he did was 'less evil' than what Che did. Lets not forget this is a comparison.

Thirdly, sure some of them were Batistaists, but many of them were Democratic reformers and/or strong opponents of communism. Overall good guys on the grand scale of things.

Lastly, again, I am going to remind you that I am not an admirer of dictators, Che or Pinochet. I won't wear there shirts, write positive movie reviews about them, or defend them in the comments. My only point in all of this, again, is that if one was to admire one...Pinochet is the far better choice.

Hispanic Pundit
http://www.HispanicPundit.com/

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Fair enough

I don't think I agree regarding relative demerits of Pino and Che. But I get your point.

My main disagreement with you is how you automatically characterize communists as bad guys, as opposed to, say, people with bad ideas. I have known communists and communist ideology was a large part in the shaping my modern culture (Jewish). Doesn't make me a communist, but I do know there were good people who believed in communism. To me being a communist is not the same as being a Nazi, which is founded almost exclusively on intolerance and racism. Communism doesn't necessarily equate to dictatorship (e.g. the Kibbutz movement), though one of my main reasons for NOT being communist is it terrible failure rate when it is used to shape a nation...and the fact that it does often lead to dictatorship. Its correlation with dictatorship is undeniable...but that doesn't require causation. Nazism is by definition totalitarian. Communism is not (again, Kibbutz example). You pretty much would say the Kibbutzniks are bad guys because they (at least originally, things have changed) believed in communism.

I think at this point, though, you and I are having a good discussion about a silly point: whose your favorite dictator? Not sure I am prepared to make such a choice.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Tweetbacks

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Reproductive rights are too often subsumed by highly contentious debates about abortion. But reproductive rights go far beyond abortion. The global fight for reproductive rights is the fight against maternal mortality, forced and coerced sterilization, and gender-based discrimination and harassment. It is the struggle to give women the power to decide for themselves whether, when, and with whom to have children, and for access to sound, medically accurate information about family planning and sexually transmitted infections. It is the battle for universal access to all forms of contraception for both women and men. And it is the effort to protect women, men, and children from the devastating effects of HIV/AIDS.

In short, the reproductive rights movement seeks to empower people all over the world by promoting their agency and control over personal sexual and reproductive health decisions.

Poll