Hillary Clinton, The Feminist Political Establishment and the White Woman's Burden [Updated]

The National bureau of NOW has issued a statement of support for Senator Kennedy

Jill over at Feministe and Ann at Feministing have already responded to the ham-handed "Betrayal" memo written and released by the head of NOW in New York State, Marcia Pappas.

Talk a living example of the "unhinged feminist" :

For more information contact: Marcia Pappas, 518-452-3944 - 518-469-2661

Senator Ted Kennedy Betrays Women by Not Standing for Hillary Clinton for President
Ultimate Betrayal Felt by Women Everywhere

ALBANY, NY (01/28/2008; 1101)(readMedia)-- Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, the Family Leave and Medical Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.

And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). “They” are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). They are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women's money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future or whatever.

This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation - to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who “know what’s best for us.”


Jill has the total win of a rebuke :

Not only am I not a die-hard Clinton supporter,* but I work for Alternet, which is apparently on the release-writer’s Organizations to Kill list. I suppose I must have been psychologically gang-banged into whoring for the patriarchy — it’s the only possible explanation.

People tend to forget that Hillary and Bill Clinton come from the South. Christopher Hitchens, who has been flogging a book while flogging the Clintons, reminds us not only of that often forgotten fact. He also reminds us that it was Hillary who decided it would beneficial to hire then strategist to Jesse Helms, Dick Morris. Yes, Hillary Clinton hired the morally repellent Dick Morris, the PR & Marketing enabler of segregationist and white supremacist Jesse Helms.

This is why it is important for Third Wave Feminists to repudiate the pathetic rants of feminists like Pappas. It is important for especially the lighter skinned leaders of this new generation of feminists to call out the inherent racism of such remarks.

They need to do this because the old guard doesn't get it.

Too mired in their political correctness, they've learned to repressed their urge to overtly shoot the black man down. They intuitively know there would be a point of no return for them if they acknowledged that. So they've learned to cloak in gender-powered speech their racist biases.

And the Clintons have played those urges for all their worth.

The Clintonistas have succeeded in creating an "unelectable white man" by siphoning almost all establishment support away from John Edwards. Add a black man as the real contender for the nomination and you have enough to stir the white supremacist tendencies of the "over 45" female majority of the Democrats' primary voting base.

I am too old to be a third waver and too Puerto Rican to consider myself a feminist in US terms. Yet being a blogger has given me the chance to meet a lot of the leaders of this new wave of US feminism. They are part of the reason why after years of repudiating the term that identified me with the likes of a Gloria Steinem, I finally came to embrace the word.

Yes. The third wavers gave me the inspiration to call myself a feminist again. That's why Marcia Pappas doesn't speak for them.

For those who want her to know that, her phone numbers are at the top of her rant (518-452-3944 - 518-469-2661). Give her a call and let her know how you feel.

I certainly am going to give a good ring or two of my own.

H/T to Ben Smith's NY NOW : "Betrayal!"


http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/hillary_clinton_the_feminist_political_establishme
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
About author n/a
liza's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
reader's picture

don't bash NOW for the comments of one person

Please don't take this as an excuse to criticize NOW in general. NOW has many members and leaders who are passionate about politics, and they don't all agree. And there are many young feminists who make up NOW, so calling it "old guard" doesn't help.

Here is national NOW's press release on the subject:
http://www.now.org/press/01-08/01-28.html


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Brian's picture

yes, but...

I think you make some good points here, but I scratched my head at this part:

"People tend to forget that Hillary and Bill Clinton come from the South."

Yes, they do. So does my partner, an incredibly smart and passionate feminist. So did Barbara Jordan. So did Molly Ivins. So do a lot of folks who are committed to a progressive future. I appreciate the attention to issues of race here, but it seems ironic that a blog post about overcoming outdated ways of thinking would hold to a monolithic notion of how everyone in a region thinks. Whatever the Clintons are doing, reading those actions as indictive of a whole category of Americans, and engaging in the casual smear of the South, feels counterproductive. Jesse Helms was an asshole. But Jesse Helms is not the whole South.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
liza's picture

Let's look at that statement closely

I'll give you that this sentence is making a blanket statement about the South.

What I should have written was that they are children of the Segregationist South and that, even though they joined many others in the fight for civil rights, went it comes to survival, you're going to go back to your roots no matter what. And in their case, they're fighting for their political survival. So for me it is clear they're going to rationalize using tactics from the political culture they come from.

I come from a Puerto Rico and it was not until I came to this country did I realize was antisemite. You have to leave home to actually be able to look back at it for what it is.

It may frustrate you for me to say that Jim Crow still exists in the South, but honestly, we're just a little over 50 years from when those laws were stricken out of the books.

The Clintons are from the last segregationist generation. We really need to remember that.

BTW : Glorian Steinem and Marcia Pappas also are children of the Jim Crow era.

It may explain the age splits between Clinton and Obama voters. Most Obama voters are adult post-boomers who grew up in a more integrated USA.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

"Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the U. S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them, and these are to be paid out of the national taxes. Does this not involve the principle of a national establishment...?"


— -- James Madison, "Essay on Monopolies" unpublished until 1946, cited in Brant, Irving, The Bill of Rights, 1965, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Poll