How in the name of reason is a forced pregnancy the liberation of a fetus and not the reproductive enslavement of a woman?

I bring your attention to this coprolite devoid of judicial, legal and philosophical reason :

[via Catholic Online]:

I end by using the expression, "Free State" with great intentionality. At another critical time in our Nations history another evil was once "sanctioned" by the Supreme Court, the "owning" of human beings as property. The Court was wrong then it is wrong now. For a while, some States were "Free States" and some were "Slave States." After Roe is overturned, that will probably occur once again. Our work will not be over with the coming demise of Roe v. Wade, it only begins. Our goal is not simply to expose and oppose the current anti-culture of death; it is to build a new culture of life, and a civilization of love to replace it.

GoogleNews and Yahoo!News have decided that no feminist blogs will be rotated as part of their sources covering abortion and reproductive rights while fascist Catholic crap like this gets promoted by them as newsworthy. Which is why, all I get on my GoogleNews alerts are anti-choice, dominionist "news sources" on the topic of abotion like Catholic.org. And all I get to read ... oh, yipee ... is stupidity like the one quoted here.

This meme of "striking down Roe is like striking down Dred Scott" has got to end.

Feminists need to be more pointed and forceful in their language :

* Not just "a woman's right to choose" but "an American's right to choose" because it reminds everybody, not just the pregnacists, that women are citizens too.

* The opposite of "pro-life" is not pro-choice. It's forced and coerced pregnancy.

* Forced and coerced pregnancies do not lead to willful giving up the newborns for adoptions. Since a forced and coerced pregnancy negates a woman's right to choose and her will, the births lead to using women for human harvesting.

Enough of the bullshit metaphors around women's reproductive autonomy. We need to paint the picture of our reproductive enslavement just exactly as it has already been in history, how it already exists the present so that the painted future will be understood not as far fetched but too dangerous a reality.


liza's picture

| | | | | | | | | |


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1555 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

The Village has defined the diversity narrative for 2008: it’s the Great Estrogen Hope against the Pleasant Negro. The Establishment White Guy fits the neighborhood but not the narrative. And the Latino has to wait his turn.


— Kevin Hayden on his endorsement for John Edwards, Support this great candidate for 2008; an obvious leader


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify