Monday Morning Rant

Here's something I wanted to rant about last week but it got totally side-tracked by the John Edwards bloggers debacle. Especially since it is a perfect follow-up to the hypocrisy surrounding that debacle. A hypocrisy based on how a certain kind of woman uses language.
I was told by a party insider they could not link to this blog because I used the word "panties" in one of my posts.
Yes people. Like 9 year-olds, Democrats are skittish of the word used for a girls' cootie catcher.
Do I have to be a multi-millinaire political socialite or a couple of guys dressed in blog drag for it to be acceptable? What of the DNC linking to the aforementioned blog back in 2004 when it had a media dilettante who's shitck at said blog was to endlessly pepper her posts with sodomy jokes?
Does choosing not to link to this blog have something to do with common decency or is it just out right censorship?
Banned Words | Censorship | Freedom of Speech | Language | Obscenity | Rhetoric | 2007 Democratic National Convention Winter Meeting
What I've Always Wondered
is, does anyone actually WEAR ruffle-covered undies like this, which surely would just make you look fat? I get wearing long hair at least, even though it's a bother for us, b/c so many men are passionate about it, but in this case -- I don't know many men who prefer squashy and thicky through the middle. Huh.
Panties? Hell, I've read a
Panties? Hell, I've read a lot worse than "panties" here. They need to keep reading. Maybe they can work themselves up to being really offended! 
Nance
Oh, pshaw.
"Oh, so you want to get your panties in a wad over my mentioning panties in a post? Fine. So I just won't have anything to do with panties anymore at all. There. How do you like them, er, apples?"
oh, and besides...
...you missed a prime opportunity to do some pirceless product placement by not posting the link to http://www.cafepress.com/culturekitchen.60615321 in your panties polemic, ahem ahem...

































pathetic. the new regime
pathetic. the new regime just as uptight as the old one.lets get a new government, a actuall democratic one, without the prude afliction with no corporate rule. oh wait wasnt that here before our Pilgrim ancestors got carried away? Damn.