Monday Morning Rant


Here's something I wanted to rant about last week but it got totally side-tracked by the John Edwards bloggers debacle. Especially since it is a perfect follow-up to the hypocrisy surrounding that debacle. A hypocrisy based on how a certain kind of woman uses language.

I was told by a party insider they could not link to this blog because I used the word "panties" in one of my posts.

Yes people. Like 9 year-olds, Democrats are skittish of the word used for a girls' cootie catcher.

Do I have to be a multi-millinaire political socialite or a couple of guys dressed in blog drag for it to be acceptable? What of the DNC linking to the aforementioned blog back in 2004 when it had a media dilettante who's shitck at said blog was to endlessly pepper her posts with sodomy jokes?

Does choosing not to link to this blog have something to do with common decency or is it just out right censorship?


liza's picture

| | | | | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Soylent Green's picture

pathetic. the new regime

pathetic. the new regime just as uptight as the old one.lets get a new government, a actuall democratic one, without the prude afliction with no corporate rule. oh wait wasnt that here before our Pilgrim ancestors got carried away? Damn.


JJ Ross's picture

What I've Always Wondered

is, does anyone actually WEAR ruffle-covered undies like this, which surely would just make you look fat? I get wearing long hair at least, even though it's a bother for us, b/c so many men are passionate about it, but in this case -- I don't know many men who prefer squashy and thicky through the middle. Huh.


NanceConfer's picture

Panties? Hell, I've read a

Panties? Hell, I've read a lot worse than "panties" here. They need to keep reading. Maybe they can work themselves up to being really offended! Smiling

Nance


M. Loutre's picture

Oh, pshaw.

"Oh, so you want to get your panties in a wad over my mentioning panties in a post? Fine. So I just won't have anything to do with panties anymore at all. There. How do you like them, er, apples?"


M. Loutre's picture

oh, and besides...

...you missed a prime opportunity to do some pirceless product placement by not posting the link to http://www.cafepress.com/culturekitchen.60615321 in your panties polemic, ahem ahem...


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Poll

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1382 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

Intellectual Property Rights block technology transfer and TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) promote monopolies on seeds and medicines and piracy of Third World biodiversity and indigenous knowledge.

That is why we had to fight WR Grace and USDA to revoke the Neem Patent, we had to fight Ricetec to prevent them claiming our basmati as their invention. And we have successfully fought

The rules of The World Trade Organization were designed to impoverish poor people and poor countries, transform their biodiversity and water commons into corporate property so that seed multi-national corporations like Monsanto could sell us our seeds for $1 tr. per year and water giants like Suez and Bechtel could sell us our water for another trillion. And the free trade rules of agriculture are robbing Indian peasants of $1 trillion per year through falling prices because of $400 billion subsidies in rich countries distorting trade by distorting prices.

This is not just a recipe for poverty, it is a recipe for genocide. In the free trade world that Bhagwati upholds, peasants sell kidneys to pay debt for poisons, displaced rural women sell their bodies to feed their children, hospitals become centers of organ theft, and India which sold the finest fabrics and tastiest spices to the world becomes the dumping ground for the toxic wste of 9/11 and the exploded and unexploded shells from the war in Afganistan and Iraq.

Free trade is becoming a mechanism to take our wealth, our biodiversity, our minerals, our brains and give us trash and toxic in exchange. It is an exchange of "bads" for "goods". This is not comparative advantage, it is loot. Which is why we say, "Our World is not for sale".


— Vandana Shiva, ecofeminist activist
ZNet Commentary: An Attack On People's Movements


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify