PDF2007 Podcast : Net Neutrality is a civil rights issue

UPDATE 23 MAY 2007:
Click here to listen to the podcast

Last saturday I facilitated a session at the Personal Democracy Unconference, which took place at Pace University's downtown NYC campus.

To those who don't know what means unconference, the concept is an interesting take on the old formula. People come in with a topic or set of topics they'd like to talk about. All the topics are placed written on a piece of paper and placed on the wall, next to an empty schedule grid. Once the organizers give it a go, facilitators place on their preferred time slot and/or negotiate with other facilitators the timing of their session.

The session I facilitated was titled, Reframing Net Neutrality as a Civil Rights Issues. I honestly wasn't expecting more than a few people but was amazed when about a dozen strong came to the corner where I was set up. Nancy Scola, Aldon Hines, Cheryl Contee, Ruby Sinreich, Ed Cone, Heather Holdridge and so many other amazing people came to discuss this important issue that has been amazingly bogged down by too much geek speak.

What's at the core of Net Neutrality? There's people who can put this better than me, but at the heart of the debate is the issue that internet providers should have the right to distinguish all sorts of bandwidth usage in order to better manage their resources and provide better service. The concern is that companies like YouTube may literally clog the internets and it's tubes.

The problem with this discussion is manifold, most of it in the technology front. What has been absent from the debate between network engineers and assorted geeks is the potential impact bandwidth or traffic discrimination may have on the rights of US citizens to use freely the net. In other words, not much has been done to clarify how our civil liberties offline will be kept intact online --without cable or telecoms availing themselves of their rights to trade secrets to infringe on Americans rights to free speech, free assembly, due process or the right to privacy online.

So what you will hear is the raw and unedited capture of this conversation. We didn't come out with too many answers to the question, "how do you reframe it?" But we all agreed it was one of the most satifying discussions about the intersections between technology, politics, culture and the law that any of us had had in a long time.

Hope you enjoy it too.

UPDATE!
There seems to be some issues streaming the audio. Right click it to download the whole MP3.

Drupal doesn't play nicely with podcasts. We now have a new podcast blog found at http://podcasts.culturekitchen.com

culturekitchen PODCASTS

You can also subscribe to our podcasts through iTunes :

You can listen the audio stream at :
PDF Unconference on Net Neutrality

http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/pdf2007_podcast_net_neutrality_is_a_civil_rights_issue
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
No votes yet
About author

Liza Sabater is the founding blogger and publisher of culturekitchen and Daily Gotham. She also a new media producer and social technologist with 10 years experience. You can reach her at blogdiva [at] culturekitchen.com or follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/blogdiva

liza's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
HandsOffPlease's picture

good call

hi liza! You make a great point about framing the message. Most people hear net neutrality and think the internet will die without it but they don't realize the bandwidth constraints we face with all the new technologies like Joost becoming more popular. I work with Hands Off the Internet and we understand that most techies out there understand the debate. We need to keep the internet free and unregulated as much as possible so we are able to catch up with our European and Asian counterparts and take advantage of all the new applications out there. Thanks again,
HandsOffPlease

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
liza's picture

I call bullshit

Hands Off the Internet is one of the most misleading and fallacious propaganda machines out there. I am exactly against the kind of free-marketism that puts business before civil rights.

So no. I am not on the same team as you.

On the contrary, as an arm of the telecoms and cable companies, I see you as the enemy of civil liberties and democracy on the net.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Tweetbacks

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

I of all people should know better. The civil rights movement in the U.S. told women to stop talking about gender issues because first the fight against racism had to be won. The feminist movement frowned at women of colour raising their issues, insisting that first the fight against the patriarchy had to be won. The nationalist movements in Africa insisted that feminism was a corrupt and decadent western import, and that first we had to capture our earthly kingdoms, and achieve our panAfricanist Nirvana, before we started looking at "side issues". And those of us who are interested in our contemporary political dynamics have fallen into the same pit of not tackling the prickly, the uncomfortable questions now: we are waiting to win the larger battle before we clean our house. There is always another battle or another issue, and the matters that matter to the foot soldiers are postponed for yet another day. Yet, these issues ARE the battle. We fight for freedom --and do not imagine we are doing anything less--because it is the freedom to live our lives the way we want, from the jobs we choose to the people we fall in love with. If we cannot tackle them, then we are not equipped to tackle anything. What are the lines of difference we draw? For what do we engage, argue, participate and in some heroes' cases, take awful risks? For what?

Poll