Should she stay or should she go?

ABC News and Washington Post published a poll today saying that most Democrats want Hillary Clinton to stay in the race if she wins any of today's state primaries, even by a small margin.

More mind-boggling is their alleged support for a Hillary Clinton Vice-Presidency. After the campaign she has run, I am absolutely speechless about that prospect.

In this sampling of US Americans, 50% of Democrats want Barack Obama to win the nomination over Clinton's 43%.

And who are these Americans? They're only white or Black ---and "teh blakz" are adjusted to represent the minority they're supposed to be, but of course.

"Other" squeaks in at just 1%.

The PDF of the poll is here.


liza's picture

| | | | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PSoTD's picture

This is a stupid poll

It's quite possible that Clinton could end up with a better delegate total if she barely lost both Texas and Ohio than if she lost one state considerably and won the other marginally. The question shouldn't be about states, but about delegate totals for the day. If she wins the totals, maybe that's an argument for her to stay, if she loses the totals, that's definitely an argument for her to leave.


liza's picture

It's not just stupid in the totals

Dude! The sampling!

When was this country just about black and white people? I mean ... augh!


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 2009 guests online.

Words to live by

"I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling in religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises...Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government...

"But it is only proposed that I should recommend, not prescribe a day of fasting and prayer. That is, that I should indirectly assume to the U.S. an authority over religious exercises which the Constitution has directly precluded them from.... I do not believe it is for the interest of religion to invite the civil magistrate to direct it's exercises, it's discipline, or it's doctrines; nor of the religious societies that the general government should be invested with the power of effecting any uniformity of time or matter among them. Fasting and prayer are religious exercises. The enjoining them an act of discipline. Every religious society has a right to determine for itself the times for these exercises, and the objects proper for them, according to their own particular tenets; and this right can never be safer than in their own hands, where the constitution has deposited it...every one must act according to the dictates of his own reason, and mine tells me that civil powers alone have been given to the President of the U.S. and no authority to direct the religious exercises of his constituents."


— -- Thomas Jefferson, to Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify