So Jerry Falwell, Founder of Moral Majority, died

So ... how are you feeling about it?


liza's picture

| | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NanceConfer's picture

Checking. . .

Yep, I still feel fine about it.

Nance


NanceConfer's picture

And I

like the cool point thing next to the comments. Smiling

Nance


mole333's picture

One less fanatic

How would I feel if one of Iran's Ayatollahs died? What would I feel if one of the Wahabi leaders in Saudi Arabia died? How do I feel when any fanatical advocate of hatred dies?

Not bad. I am not one to wish death on people that much but I certainly do NOT mourn the death of someone who spent his life advocating intolerance and religious extremism. I don't like Muslim extremism so why would I like the same kind of extremism from a Christian?


liza's picture

At least now

Tinky Winky can live out and proud and in peace ... Laughing out loud


rwallnerny2007's picture

Falwell

Well I suppose the kind thing to say is that maybe he repented his past at the time of his death. You always hope people change in the end. In order to have good guys, you need good bad guys. A hero needs villains. Falwell was an excellent villain for the left.

Of course I'm sure Larry Flynt is already hard at work on the Jerry Falwell Memorial Issue of Hustler Magazine. In which Flynt will claim to have had a seance and contacted Falwell in the hereafter, and gotten his old adversary to relate the rest of his sexual fantasies he had about his mother. I mean being dead, he can finally admit Flynt was telling the truth. Smiling


NanceConfer's picture

And maybe pigs will fly

I have no interest in being kind to anyone who is such a destructive force -- dead or alive.

Nance


rwallnerny2007's picture

Falwell

Christopher Hitchens wrote a great piece about Falwell's passing on Slate which I excerpt here:

"Hitchens wrote a nice piece on the event.

http://www.slate.com/id/2166337/

Faith-Based Fraud

Jerry Falwell's foul rantings prove you can get away with anything if you have "Reverend" in front of your name.

By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Wednesday, May 16, 2007, at 12:46 PM ET

The discovery of the carcass of Jerry Falwell on the floor of an obscure office in Virginia has almost zero significance, except perhaps for two
categories of the species labeled "credulous idiot." The first such category consists of those who expected Falwell (and themselves) to be
bodily raptured out of the biosphere and assumed into the heavens, leaving pilotless planes and driverless trucks and taxis to crash with their innocent victims as collateral damage. This group is so stupid and
uncultured that it may perhaps be forgiven. It is so far "left behind" that almost its only pleasure is to gloat at the idea of others being abandoned in the same condition.

The second such category is of slightly more importance, because it consists of the editors, producers, publicists, and a host of other
media riffraff who allowed Falwell to prove, almost every week, that there is no vileness that cannot be freely uttered by a man whose name is prefaced with the word Reverend. Try this: Call a TV station and tell them that you know the Antichrist is already on earth and is an adult Jewish male. See how far you get. Then try the same thing and add that
you are the Rev. Jim-Bob Vermin. "Why, Reverend, come right on the show!" What a fool Don Imus was. If he had paid the paltry few bucks to make himself a certified clergyman, he could be jeering and sneering to the present hour.

Falwell went much further than his mad 1999 assertion about the Jewish Antichrist. In the time immediately following the assault by religious fascism on American civil society in September 2001, he used his regular indulgence on the airwaves to commit treason. Entirely exculpating the suicide-murderers, he asserted that their acts were a divine punishment
of the United States. Again, I ask you to imagine how such a person would be treated if he were not supposedly a man of faith.

One of his associates, Bailey Smith, once opined that "God does not hear the prayers of a Jew." This is one of the few anti-Semitic remarks ever made that has a basis in fact, since God does not exist and does not attend to any prayers, but Smith was not quite making that point. Along with his friend Pat Robertson, who believes in secret Jewish control of
the world of finance, and Billy Graham, who boasted to Richard Nixon that the Jews had never guessed what he truly thought of them, Falwell kept alive the dirty innuendo about Jews that so many believing
Christians seem to need. This would be bad enough in itself, and an additional reason to deplore the free ride he was given on television, if his trade-off had not been even worse.

Seeking to deflect the charge of anti-Jewish prejudice, Falwell adopted the cause of the most thuggish and demented Israeli settlers,
proclaiming that their occupation of the West Bank and Gaza was a holy matter and hoping that they might help to bring on Armageddon and the return of the Messiah. A detail in this ghastly narrative, as adepts of the "Left Behind" series will know, is that the return of the risen Christ will require the mass slaughter or mass conversion of all Jews.
This consideration did not prevent Menachem Begin from awarding Falwell the Jabotinsky Centennial Medal in 1980 and has not inhibited other Israeli extremists from embracing him and his co-thinkers ever since.

All bigots and frauds are brothers under the skin. Trying to interrupt the fiesta of piety on national television on the night of Falwell's death, I found myself waiting while Ralph Reed went all moist about the role of the departed in empowering "people of faith." Here was the hypocritical casino-based Christian who sought and received the kosher
stamp from Jack Abramoff. Perfect.

Like many fanatical preachers, Falwell was especially disgusting in exuding an almost sexless personality while railing from dawn to dusk about the sex lives of others. His obsession with homosexuality was on a
par with his lip-smacking evocations of hellfire. From his wobbly base of opportunist fund raising and degree-mill money-spinning in Lynchburg,Va., he set out to puddle his sausage-sized fingers into the intimate arrangements of people who had done no harm. Men of this type, if they cannot persuade enough foolish people to part with their savings,
usually end up raving on the street and waving placards about the coming day of judgment. But Falwell, improving on the other Chaucerian frauds
from Oral Roberts to Jim Bakker to Ted Haggard, not only had a TV show of his own but was also regularly invited onto mainstream ones.

The evil that he did will live after him. This is not just because of the wickedness that he actually preached, but because of the hole that
he made in the "wall of separation" that ought to divide religion from politics. In his dingy racist past, Falwell attacked those churchmen who
mixed the two worlds of faith and politics and called for civil rights. Then he realized that two could play at this game and learned to play it
himself. Then he won the Republican Party over to the idea of religious voters and faith-based fund raising. And now, by example at least, he
has inspired emulation in many Democrats and liberals who would like to borrow the formula. His place on the cable shows will be amply filled by
Al Sharpton: another person who can get away with anything under the rubric of Reverend. It's a shame that there is no hell for Falwell to go
to, and it's extraordinary that not even such a scandalous career is enough to shake our dumb addiction to the "faith-based."

[end story]

**applause**


We like

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1790 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

Let's begin with capitalism, a word that has gone largely out of fashion. The approved reference now is to the market system. This shift minimizes --indeed, deletes-- the role of wealth in the economic and social system. And it sheds the adverse connotation going back to Marx. Instead of the owners of capital or their attendants in control, we have the admirably impersonal role of market forces. It would be hard to think of a change in terminology more in the interest of those to whom money accords power. They have now a functional anonymity.

But most of the people who use the new designation --economists, in particular-- are innocent as to the effect. They see nothing wrong with their bland, descriptive terminology. They pay no attention to the important question: Whether money "wealth" accords a special power. (It does.) Thus the term innocent fraud.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify