Peace is Where You Make It

Four years in and counting.

Over the last few days, anti-war actions are taking place all over America (and all over the world) in acknowledgment of the fourth anniversary of the Bush administration's launching an illegal, immoral war of conquest in Iraq.

We-the-People seem to be rising up everywhere and demanding that our badly misused troops be brought home safely and that the neokonzertruppen's disastrous military adventure for profit in the Middle East be stopped NOW.

Sure, there were large and widely-publicized protest gatherings on the Mall in Washington on Saturday. Aren't there always? That's certainly the primary place for activists to see and be seen, donchaknow. But on Saturday and Sunday, and still today, there are also plenty of equally impassioned anti-war rallies being held in lots of other places outside the Beltway.

And not just in big fancy places like New York City and San Francisco and Seattle, either. But also -- and, arguably, much more significantly -- out in the hinterlands, in flyover country where people don't generally make that much noise about this sort of thing unless some sort of major sea change is taking place.

And you'd better believe that a major sea change is taking place. It's not just the big city liberals that are mad as hell and are not gonna take it any more -- it's Joe and Jane Average Citizen now. And it's not just happening on their evening TV news shows -- it's happening right in their own back yards. And it's not just radical youths and Gen-X troublemakers -- it's your mom, your pop, even the nuns you knew in grade school.

Compare these two quotes from today's MSM newspaper reports and you'll see what I mean. The first is a snippet from this morning's national AP feed:

"In largely peaceful demonstrations Sunday, about 1,000 people in San Francisco closed Market Street, a major downtown thoroughfare; in New York, more than 1,000 protesters converged in a park near the United Nations headquarters. Protests also were held Saturday in such cities as Los Angeles, San Diego and Hartford, Conn."

Contrast that with this excerpt from this morning's Erie Times-News, published in a blue-collar city of 100,000 located in a backwater stretch of the Rust Belt halfway between Buffalo and Cleveland:

"For an hour Sunday, a 25-foot stretch of chain-link fence in Erie served as a memorial to the more than 3,200 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq.

"Four metal posts held the fence in the snow-covered grass along East Sixth Street in front of the Pennsylvania National Guard Armory at Parade Street. The fence was put up Sunday morning for the event."

"More than a thousand people walked past during Sunday's March for Peace, organized by the Erie Peace Initiative to mark the fourth anniversary of the Iraq war. Dozens stopped to hang paper peace cranes or weave the stems of roses and carnations through the fence links.

"Veteran Chris Gerhart was the first to turn the metal barrier into something more, placing a flower arrangement on an easel there.

"The crowd behind him filled a line a block long and chanted, 'What do we want? Peace! When do we want it? Now!'

"Organizers had hoped to draw one marcher for each U.S. soldier killed in Iraq. Estimates from initiative members put the turnout at not quite one marcher for every three soldiers. Still, the group was pleased."

Yes, I should certainly think they were. That's a pretty impressive turnout for a burg that size. When over a thousand people show up to march for peace on a cold, wet, snowy Sunday in a town that's been described elsewhere as "kind of a throwback, like an industrial Mayberry" -- well, that is pretty damn significant by anybody's standards. Even CultureKitchen's. *ahem*

And that is as it should be. All politics is local, after all. Waging peace is hard work, and it will take all of us pushing together against the reich-wing warmongers to make it happen -- lest the necons' doctrine of perpetual war wins out, and we end up having to watch our kids go off to get killed fighting for oil in the Middle East too.

(FYI, here's the link to that article quoted above -- though the Times-News does require free registration in order to access their content online and articles only get posted there for 7 days, it might be worth taking the time to register & check out the site if you'd like to understand the different dynamics of living in a place like that as compared to Washington or New York.)


M. Loutre's picture

| | |


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PatientZero's picture

Great Points

some great points on the widespread nature of the protests. While this is a galvanizing issue nationwide (thus decreasing the unexpectedness of how widespread the protests are), it is also a great thing for activism in general. The USA is notoriously bad at getting out to vote, being politically aware, and generally exercising their political efficacy, but this goes to show that maybe it just depends on the issue.

Seattle is definitely seeing some protests btw. I'm interested in seeing how the screening for the PBS series is received there. Between Manji and the servicemen and women, there will be a variety of opinions for people to debate!


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 828 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

Data from the 2002 survey indicate that by age 20, 77% of respondents had had sex, 75% had had premarital sex, and 12% had married; by age 44, 95% of respondents (94% of women, 96% of men, and 97% of those who had ever had sex) had had premarital sex. Even among those who abstained until at least age 20, 81% had had premarital sex by age 44. Among cohorts of women turning 15 between 1964 and 1993, at least 91% had had premarital sex by age 30. Among those turning 15 between 1954 and 1963, 82% had had premarital sex by age 30, and 88% had done so by age 44.

Conclusions. Almost all Americans have sex before marrying. These findings argue for education and interventions that provide the skills and information people need to protect themselves from unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases once they become sexually active, regardless of marital status.


— Lawrence B. Finer, PhD
Research Division, The Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY
Trends in Premarital Sex in the United States, 1954­–2003
Public Health Reports / January–February 2007 / Volume 122


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify