History of a Flashpoint: Ossetia and the Caucasus

In 2008 Americans became aware of a region most had never head of before: South Ossetia. The nations of Russia and Georgia fought a war over South Ossetia. South Ossetia is recognized as part of Georgia by all but three nations. Russia, Nicaragua and Venezuela all recognize South Ossetia as independent, though Russia treats it more as a satellite of Russia. North Ossetia is part of Russia. Recently, about a year after the war itself, the EU issued a report on the war that blamed both Russia and Georgia for the outbreak of the war and blamed both for violations of human rights. Ossetia remains a flashpoint today with no real resolution to the conflict.

The Caucasus region, which includes several such flashpoints including Ossetia, Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, Abkhazia, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, actually has a fascinating history going back as far back as history goes.

For example, Armenia was at one time a great kingdom called Urartu (the Assyrian name you will read in most textbooks, but they called themselves "Biainili") which rivaled Egypt, Assyria and the Hittites in epic fights for control of the Middle East. Later it was a border state between Rome and Persia, making it one of the most fought over regions of antiquity.

The modern Georgians have a particularly ancient history, dating back to the ancient Greek stories of Jason and the Argonauts, which was an expedition to the city of Colchis in modern Georgia and reflects actual Greek exploration and colonization of the Black Sea area. Even before that the region was dominated by an Iranian tribe called the Cimmerians (made both famous and silly by the Conan Books, in reality a branch of the Scythians which dominated the steppes of Central Asia during ancient times).

The Caucasus were also where, in the early Middle Ages, a Jewish Kingdom called Khazaria stopped the advance of Islam in a forgotten chapter of history that has as much impact on modern times as the Christian victory over Islam in the Battle of Poitiers that is credited with stopping Islam from conquering all of Europe. If Europe is Christian today because of Charles Martel and the Franks, Russia is Christian today because of the Jewish and pagan Khazars.

Caught in the middle of the wars between the Khazars and their neighbors, and often allied with the Khazars, were the Alans, also called the Os...from which the Ossetians are descended. The Alans were a branch of the Saramatians, a later, related branch of the Iranian Scythians...in fact I always suspected they were merely a later version of the same tribal groups. According to the Roman historian the Alani were previously called the Massagetae, suggesting a link to the Germanic Getae (relatives of the Goths)? Early on the Alans were one of the tribes mixed in with the Goths and Huns who sometimes fought the Roman Empire, sometimes fought for the Roman Empire. In fact the great domino effect of barbarian migrations (not as large as originally thought, but still disruptive) that eventually brought down the Western Roman Empire began with the Huns conquering the Alans, soon to be followed by the Goths known commonly as Ostrogoths, but more accurately at that early date as the Greutungi (the Ostrogoths being a later grouping that included many groups, including part of the Greutungi). This is what pushed the next group of Goths, generally called the Visigoths but at that time more accurately called the Tervingi (the Visigoths were a later grouping formed from several groups including part of the Tervingi) into the Roman Empire where they defeated a Roman Emperor Valens at the battle of Adrianople (Hadrianopolis). That battle is often considered the beginning of the end of the Western Roman Empire. Alanic cavalry fought alongside the Tervingi at Adrianople.

After many years of being dominant players on the European stage, the Goths and Huns largely disappeared. The Goths were mostly absorbed into the Spanish, French and Italian people, though for many decades one group of Goths remained independent on the Crimean peninsula and even became part of the Khazar Kingdom. The Huns may have become the modern Bulgarians, though only after being largely absorbed into Slavic tribes. Yet the Alans remained independent and unique. Some Alans fought with the Franks. But mostly the Alans remained in the Caucasus in between the Muslims and the Jewish Khazars. In fact, the Khazars were so important in the region that many of the Alans also converted to Judaism.

After the fall of the Khazars, the Rus (original Russians, Slavic groups with influences from the eastern Vikings) conquered the region, including Alania. Some Alans moved west to disappear into the Slavic cultures. But some stayed put and became part of the Ossetian heritage.

So the Ossetians are descended from warriors who fought Rome alongside the Huns and Visigoths, and warriors who converted to Judaism and stood with the Khazars against Christians and Muslims alike. Now these latter day Alans are still there, caught between the Georgians and Russians. The ancestors of the Ossetians were so independent and ornery that while most of Europe and the Middle East were converting to Christianity and Islam, they converted to Judaism. That, too, is part of the Ossetian heritage.

Almost every modern conflict has history behind it. Many cultures have roots that go very deep even if by modern standards they are obscure. Russia is a complete newcomer to the world compared with Armenia, Georgia and Ossetia. Sometimes keeping these deep roots in mind helps us to understand why some small, obscure cultures will show such pride and independence. They've been through this before. Interestingly, the Georgians and the Ossetians are more closely related to eachother than either is to most of their neighbors, being both descended partly from Iranian horsemen of the Scythian/Saramatian cultures that knew and fought the ancient Greeks and Romans.

One caveat is, of course, that almost no culture at any time in history has been homogeneous. The groups called "Huns," "Alans," "Goths," "Slavs," etc. all were made up of numerous subgroups, some related, some not, so that genes and cultures mixed to make unique cultures. But deep roots through history still affect modern politics, and it is best to keep those roots in mind when observing modern conflicts.

http://culturekitchen.com/mole333/blog/history_of_a_flashpoint_ossetia_and_the_caucasus
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
No votes yet
mole333's picture



Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Tweetbacks

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

I of all people should know better. The civil rights movement in the U.S. told women to stop talking about gender issues because first the fight against racism had to be won. The feminist movement frowned at women of colour raising their issues, insisting that first the fight against the patriarchy had to be won. The nationalist movements in Africa insisted that feminism was a corrupt and decadent western import, and that first we had to capture our earthly kingdoms, and achieve our panAfricanist Nirvana, before we started looking at "side issues". And those of us who are interested in our contemporary political dynamics have fallen into the same pit of not tackling the prickly, the uncomfortable questions now: we are waiting to win the larger battle before we clean our house. There is always another battle or another issue, and the matters that matter to the foot soldiers are postponed for yet another day. Yet, these issues ARE the battle. We fight for freedom --and do not imagine we are doing anything less--because it is the freedom to live our lives the way we want, from the jobs we choose to the people we fall in love with. If we cannot tackle them, then we are not equipped to tackle anything. What are the lines of difference we draw? For what do we engage, argue, participate and in some heroes' cases, take awful risks? For what?

Poll