Obama Ascendant ... Edwards Fading

I predicted Hucakbee would win Iowa. It doesn't mean that much. He will probably win Wyoming and South Carolina as well. I think McCain has a good shot at New Hampshire. Giuliani might just pull off some wins. Romney...well, he may take Michigan. My money is on Huckabee winning the nomination and has been for months. But it remains a three-to-four way race among the sad, sagging Republican race. Remember that Fred Thompson was supposed to save the Republicans from complete lameness. THAT sure didn't work. So lameness it remains, but Huckabee may be the most dangerous of the lame candidates. He trounced Romney tonight and I think that MIGHT spell the end of Romney. If Romney weren't a flip-flopping creep, I wouldn't think it would matter. But given that I didn't really believe he had much of a chance from the start, I think his loss tonight is significant. I think either Huckabee will surge and dominate, or he will find himself in a close heat with either McCain or McCain and Giuliani once Feb. 5th comes around.

On the Dem side I predicted Hillary would win Iowa with Edwards a possible second. Obama pulled it off. I think this means Edwards has very little chance. By no means no chance. But the polls don't look good for him elsewhere, so losing Iowa means no momentum going forward...which bodes ill. He's no fool. He could still pull off a comeback, but I don't consider it likely.

So Hillary has had her first defeat. When I though Iowa would go for Hillary or Edwards, I was fairly convinced New Hampshire would go for Obama...I predicted that Iowa and New Hampshire would break for different candidates. I still think this is a possibility, but there is a real chance Obama could win both. Hillary is the most likely to win Michigan and Nevada. If Obama wins two and Hillary wins two at that point, given the current polls in the big states, I don't see Edwards winning unless he can do some miracle in South Carolina. But I think if Obama and Hillary have each taken two by that point, South Carolina will break for Obama. And he will be poised to be the front runner.

Then comes Florida closely followed by the big Feb 5th day. Hillary seems ahead now in California and New York and that will help her a lot, particularly combined with Michigan. If she maintains her lead in Florida, she could still waltz to a win despite Obama's early wins because with Michigan, Florida, California and New York, she will be doing just fine. But...if Obama wins Iowa, New Hampshire, AND South Carolina, I think Florida and California may shift. Also, if Edawrds has won NOTING by South Carolina, he may drop and then where his supporters break will be key. I think they may split between Obama and Hillary, but they could easily throw Florida and California to Obama if Edwards drops out.

Without Iowa, Edwards really needs a win in Michigan or South Carolina to keep himself afloat, and the polls have not been encouraging for him so far. Iowa meant more to him than it did to either Obama or Hillary. Hillary could easily take a loss in Iowa as long as she maintains her Michigan and Florida leads. Obama could also take a loss in Iowa, though a win REALLY boosts him. But Edwards was polling better in Iowa than in any other early state and he really needed that. I think this was his death blow, but I know there is enough uncertainty that I could be proven wrong.

I say Romney and Edwards are hurt badly tonight. Obama is boosted. Hillary remains about where she was.

New Hampshire will go McCain (or Romney...) and Obama (or Hillary). Again, a win for Obama will be big, a loss for Hillary not such a big deal...IF she can maintain her lead in Michigan and Florida.

I am excited. A black man won the Iowa caucus. Martin Luther King, jr. would be smiling.

http://culturekitchen.com/mole333/blog/obama_ascendant_edwards_fading
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
No votes yet
mole333's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
liza's picture

I think Edwards has a fighting chance

His is a true grassroots campaign --little money but completely "retail" : door-to-door, pounding the pavement 24/7.

I am actually going to send a little thing to both him and Obama. At this point, I don't care if either wins. As long as we don't have another dynasty nominated, I don't care if it is Edwards or Obama.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Hell, I'd take ANY of them

I like all three. Yeah, I have been down on Hillary for various reasons, and she'd be largely last century's politics. I would prefer new politics. But I would still a.) be more than happy to have our first and LONG overdue woman President, and b.) am confident that she would be a capable, if a bit too corporate, President.

Edwards and Obama would make me happier because they are the new generation. But won't be sad if Hillary wins.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
anonymous blogger's picture

Edwards

The entrance polls showed that Obama got the majority of the "liberal" vote and Edwards the majority of the "conservative" vote. This probably has Edwards and his people scratching their heads and going "what the hell?" Edwards did everything humanly possible to come across as the most liberal candidate, except write "I'm the most liberal!" in big letters on his forehead. Edwards also made a hard push for the young vote. Liberal voters went solidly for Obama. Young voters went overwhelmingly for Obama. Edwards got the conservative, white, male vote. Basically the same vote he got four years ago when the young and liberals went for Dean. What can you do?

Edwards needed a push out of Iowa b/c unlike Obama and Hillary he does not have a lot of money and he took matching funds. He has big problems moneywise now as people aren't going to be falling all over themselves to contribute to him now.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

On This Day

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

We were supposed to teach the Iraqis about democracy, not the other way around.

— Drew Westen in his Book: "The Political Brain"

Poll