The Death of the Eisenhower Republican

There was a time, barely remembered today, when the idea of bipartisanship really seemed reasonable. There was once a kind of Republican, now driven to the verge of extinction, called the "Eisenhower Republican." Today, the equivalent beast would be called a "Moderate Democrat." The Republican Party itself has largely purged itself of Eisenhower Republicans in its radical shift to the right.

I have always been a Democrat. But even the earliest President I remember, Richard Nixon, though a crazy, paranoid, power hungry SOB, could be ideologically reasonable, as evidenced by his establishment of the EPA. But Nixon, probably unintentionally, began the decline of the Eisenhower Republican. Some of those he brought into government are the very same "barking crazy rightwingers" who have systematically been destroying our nation under Bush. That, combined with Nixon's spectacular and televised downfall, discredited the reasonable, moderate Republican. The Democrats, then more liberal than now, were ready to take advantage of Nixon's downfall, and the far right wing Republicans, then marginalized but poised to strike, were ready to begin their plans to take over the nation through lying, stealing and cheating.

One man had a small chance of saving the Eisenhower Republican: President Gerald Ford.

Gerald Ford, the last of the Eisenhower Republicans who had any chance of saving the Republican Party from the barking crazy rightwingers, has died.

Gerald Ford had been a well-respected Congressman, someone who could work with both parties to get things done. As criminal charges consumed Nixon and his administration, Gerald Ford was the last chance Republicans had of restoring respectability. Centrist, traditionalist and all around nice guy, Ford might have been the only person who could have saved the Republican Party from being taken over by extremists or lapsing into obscurity.

Pardoning Nixon and the stagflation Ford inherited from Nixon pretty much made it impossible for Ford to succeed. In the end, a moderate Democrat (Jimmy Carter) defeated Ford for President, and the right wing fringe of the Republican Party swept in to destroy the Eisenhower Republicans and take over. Those right wing nutcases have not only gone to great lengths to destroy our Constitution and to run up the biggest budget deficits in hitsory, but have also by now alienated moderate Republicans. The death of the Eisenhower branch of the Republican Party was one reason why Democrats won this year.

And with the Republican Party now nearly completely dominated by anti-democracy, right wing fools, and with Democrats winning by appealing to American moderates, Gerald Ford, at the age of 93, has died.

America has always been and should remain a two-party system. Why? Because we, as a culture, divide pretty solidly into Federalist and State's Rights camps...strict interpretation vs. loose interpretation of the Constitution... These are very real ambiguities within our system, left ambiguous by those who formed our government, and it is the give and take between these two views of government that has made our nation strong. The big danger now is that one party, the Republicans, have been taken over by a group that believes in neither of these philosophies of government except as a way of fooling voters. Instead, the barking crazy rightwingers have, in essence, thrown the whole Constitutional dichotomy out the window and have tried instituting a one-party, Soviet system of crony capitalism, corruption and war profiteering.

I have always been a Democrat and almost certainly will remain a Democrat for life. Why? Because I like the fact that the Democratic Party represents America's diversity in almost every way and, by and large, is more representative of the average American than the more elitist, pro-wealthy Republican Party has been since Harding's time. You'd have to go back before Harding before I would consider the Republican Party more representative of my views than the Democratic Party.

But I respect a healthy, moderate Republican Party, the Eisenhower Republicans, to balance the two-party American system. That is why Ford's failure to hold the line against the right wing extremists within the Republican Party is a shame and why I am saddened by Ford's death.

Since Ford's presidency, the entire track of the Republican Party has been towards more and more extremism, more and more lies, more and more greed, and more and more corruption. Almost every traditional, Eisenhower Republican ideal has been thrown out by the barking crazy rightwingers, as the three largest deficits in our history came from Reagan, the elected Bush and the current little Bush and as the idea of "small government" has been thrown out the window in a greedy rush to publicly fund the corrupt military-industrial-religious extremist complex.

I can only hope that the Republican Party can rediscover its Gerald Ford/Dwight Eisenhower side and reject the extremists who currently control their Party.


mole333's picture

| | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PoliticalCritic's picture

Ford

Ford would've been better off accepting the invitation to play for the Green Bay Packers or Detroit Lions. Now that's a great life. Who turns down the NFL? Playing football for money is a beautiful thing.

Instead, he becomes President and pardons a man who belonged in jail. He didn't do it to move the country ahead. He did it to save the Republican party from more disgrace.


pops's picture

Jerry Was Just Fine By Me!

When Bob Dole ran for president most people thought he was nuts when he said his only real agenda was to get the govt organized and put in better shape. As such he was the last national voice that represented the old Republican ideal that govt works best when it works efficiently. Guys like Dole and Ford had nothing against what used to be called the safety net. They thought that welfare was fine just as long as it got to the people who needed it at a low cost.

The question here is how did we go from wanting a govt that works effciently to a govt so small, as Grover Nordquist has said, that it could be drown in a bathtub?

Govt wasn't the enemy to guy like Jerry Ford, it was a tool that could be used to really help people's lives. Under him there was LEAA - the Law Enforcement Assistance Act that standardized the road signs (i.e. merge left, ped xing etc) and let local police buy better communications equipment.

Jerry was a hell of a president. When I was 18 I went to the draft office and signed up. Six months later I got a letter say that President Gerald R. Ford signed an executive order indefinitely suspending the draft. No further action was required on my part, but I had to carry my draft card until I was 24. Thus I was free to have a legal ID that got me cigs and beer without ever having to have a single thought about unnecessary foreign entabglements.

Thanks Jerry.


Tara Parks's picture

Ford: RIP

nice writing, Mole333.


SteamGeek's picture

RE Ford from Michigan

Aside from the "customary" pardon Ford provided Nixon, if I'm not mistaken he had a rather long and distinguished career in Government, while also never being dragged thru the mud or having his reputation sullied.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ford

Considering Ford's pardon of Nixon, how do we measure the ethics of the hundreds of questionable pardons granted by Clinton in his final hours in office?

Is there some sort of double standard here?


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1775 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

When people in the media wish to criticize bloggers they should start naming names and start being specific. If we aren't important enough to be engaged specifically than ignore us. It's fair to talk about the blogosphere as a collective at times as it's fair to talk about the mainstream media as a collective at times, but complaining about the nasty tone of the whole party is just cheap and sloppy journalism.

The greater sin of Cohen today was implying that blog readers are balkanized into political camps and are therefore uninformed and stupid. That's one of the worst misconceptions of people who read blogs who are, after all, the people who are most interested in news and political debate - interested enough spend a more than healthy amount of time online keeping up to speed. Cohen shows contempt for the people most likely to know who he is and care about what he writes.


— Atrios (Duncan Black),Eschaton | Blog Rage


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify