"The Piggishness is in the Race..."
“We are Jewish because there are people out there who would kill us for being Jewish.â€
At a time when I was simultaneously becoming more agnostic/atheist and more Jewish (perhaps in the tradition of Isaac Deutcher who recognized a place within Judaism for non-believing Jews), I quite naturally posed the age old question of just what it means to be a Jew. Parts of my quest to answer this question for myself have become diaries on various blogs. Genetic, cultural, tribal, religious, nationalistic and historical definitions of Judaism all combine into a mish mash that must be confusing to non-Jews but that I have come to see as a very key aspect to Jewish identity. I have come to see this identity crisis as a core part of Judaism that goes back as far as we can trace.
That’s how I think. Immerse in the complexity and maybe even add to that complexity with some paradoxes: atheists can be perfectly good Jews, identity crisis can be a defining feature of identity, etc.
My wife thinks differently than I. And her response to the question of Jewish identity was characteristically terse and to the point:
“We are Jewish because there are people out there who would kill us for being Jewish.â€
I think one reason why this occurred to my wife is thanks to a visit we made to Eastern Europe. In both Latvia and Russia we found that people immediately spotted us as Jews. We never got that feeling in America or Israel. In both America and Israel we were seen as Americans, period. Should we wish to indicate our Jewishness we could, but no one spotted us from a distance and categorized us as Jews. In Latvia and Russia, the recognition was immediate. Sometimes it was matter of fact. On a night train from Latvia to Moscow, a route with few tourists, the woman who checked our tickets look at my wife’s name and first asked if we were Polish. We said no. Her next guess was Israeli. As far as I know nothing about us suggests Israeli, but that was her second guess. Only on her third guess did she pick American. But that was trivial. She was friendly and kind through the entire ride.
In Latvia we were recognized as Jews by some construction workers and their jeers were not that hard to figure out even if we couldn’t understand their language. Similar things happened in Petersburg, Russia, where swastika graffiti and “White Power†T-shirts were also a frequent sight. People could see we were Jewish and hated us for it. Yet most Americans and Israelis would see us and simply think “American.†For the record, my boss while I lived in Japan also saw me as very “American†and he is familiar with English speaking gaijin of all sorts, from Birts to Scots to Aussies.
The Spanish Inquisition (a version of which still exists in more benign form today in the Vatican) had several targets. Jews and Protestants could be brutally killed at will. But one main target was was the conversos, Jews who had been forced to convert to Catholicism by the Spanish. Somehow these ambiguous people, once Jewish, now not, were seen as one of the biggest threats by the Spanish Catholic Church. At first the Papacy did not agree and was happy to welcome converted Jews, but some Popes, like Paul IV, took the attitude of the Inquisition and saw these converts, no matter how Christian, as suspect and was known to burn them alive from time to time. In fact, it didn’t even matter if your family had been good, practicing Catholics for generations, the taint of having once been Jewish remained and the Inquisition was always a threat.
“We are Jewish because there are people out there who would kill us for being Jewish.â€
The intellectual underpinnings of Nazi Germany’s anti-Semitism partly came from a British author named Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Supposedly a historian (yet seemingly ignorant of much history) Chamberlain hypothesized that civilizations and great nations rose by expelling Jews and fell when they became “polluted†by Jews. Needless to say, people like Himmler pissed themselves with glee when they read this and used it as one basis of their policy towards the Jews.
The 1935 Nuremburg Laws enshrined what many Jews already knew. It didn’t matter who you were, what you believed or what you worshipped, if you had any Jewish ancestry you were Jewish. Or, put more popularly in 1930’s Germany:
“Was er glaubt is einerlei
In der Rasse liegt die Schweinerei.â€
Translated in Melvin Konner’s book Unsettled as:
“It doesn’t matter what his faith,
the piggishness is in the race.â€
Which, in effect, says the same thing my wife says:
“We are Jewish because there are people out there who would kill us for being Jewish.â€
The first step towards genocide is to define your target as less than human. This is a common motif in human history. Hindus and Buddhists in Sri Lanka have done this during their terrible civil war. Hutu and Tutsis have done this. Americans did it regarding blacks and Native Americans. Japanese have done it regarding Koreans and Chinese. And, of course, many have done it regarding the Jews.
Accuse your target of cannibalism. Call him an animal or a pig or a dog. Say “they are not like us.†That particularly chilling line was used by an Italian factory owner describing his African workers in a Current TV segment on African immigrants in Italy. What this means is, “they aren’t REAL humans so I don’t have to treat them the same way I treat REAL humans.â€
Virulent anti-Semitism in Poland and other nations in Eastern Europe did not begin nor end with the Nazi occupation. Poland had anti-Jewish laws similar to those the Nazis had in place before 1939. And anti-Jewish attacks continued in Poland after liberation, lasting well into 1946. The nearly complete extermination and expulsion of the Jews from Poland, where once there were 3.5 million Jews, was a collaboration between Poles and Germans. And the 21st century has seen a large increase in anti-Semitism worldwide, particularly since 9/11, interestingly enough. Though such a surge is not the equivalent of the massive pogroms and torture that has been seen coming in waves from the Middle Ages on, such surges have in the past preceded pogroms.
Growing up I was barely Jewish. We would take the Jewish holidays off from school each year, but that didn’t mean we did anything Jewish. On Yom Kippur, the day of fasting and atonement, we would take off from school and have Mu Shu pork at our favorite Chinese restaurant. That was the kind of Jew we were.
But history and current events have taught me that it doesn’t matter what I worship, what I say or what I eat. There are many out there who would kill me for being Jewish. And my wife is right. That realization shapes my personal identity, making me more Jewish than I probably would choose to be otherwise. It leads me to support Israel more strongly than I might otherwise because, in the final analysis, the only difference between now and, say, 1920’s Europe for Jews is the existence of Israel. The Shoah could happen again, right here and right now. And, as in the 1920’s and 1930’s, many nations would probably refuse to take Jewish refugees. But at least there is Israel. For the first time since the Roman Empire (excepting the semi-mythical Kingdom of the Khazars) there is one place on earth where being Jewish is accepted, normal and relatively safe. And there is a well-armed, pretty kick ass Jewish army for the first time since perhaps the Maccabees…even if, like the Maccabees, that army sometimes resorts to brutality that I cannot accept. But I can’t help but be thankful that army is there, that Jewish state is there. I once pointed out to a Muslim friend that it is the only place in the world where being Jewish is completely the accepted norm, compared with the majority of the world where either Islam or Christianity is the accepted norm. He thought about it and recognized in it a parallel to his own Shi’a, a branch of Islam that often has been persecuted and rarely has had a nation to call home. Currently Iran is, to my knowledge, the only nation where Shi’a Islam is the dominant belief, though several Sunni dominated nations have large Shi’a populations.
I should also note that I recognize a similar reason for a Palestinian state. Although Palestinians share a religion with a large chunk of the world’s population, ethnically they are marginalized and mistreated even by their fellow Muslims. They, too, have no state to call their own and are vulnerable because of it. That is one of many reasons why I support the existence of two viable states, Israel and Palestine.
History is filled with examples of my wife’s statement. The Spanish Inquisition, Chamberlain’s stupid historical theories, and the Nazi’s genocidal applications of those stupid historical theories are merely a few examples. And I don’t expect this to go away. But the realization that it exists does help me understand my own identity and my identity within a larger society. My friend’s comparison with Shi’a Islam aside, I am not sure how applicable my own thoughts about my Jewish identity translates to understanding the experience of other minority and threatened groups. But I strongly suspect that there is a shared psychology, if not actual shared experience, that can be used to help understand the experience of other such groups.
anti-semitism | holocaust | pogroms | Racism | Shoah | Spanish Inquisistion
Isaac Deutscher
Also you mentioned Isaac Deutscher. Interestingly enough I am in the middle of his most famous work, the three volume biography of his hero Leon Trotsky. (The Prophet Armed, The Prophet Unarmed, and The Prophet Outcast, I'm on the middle book) Trotsky believed there was a place in Communist society for non-communists, for those who did not tow the party line. It sounds like Deutscher's own views regarding non-jews and judaism that you refer to may have been infuenced by his Trotskyism.
In these books, Deutscher portrays Trotsky as a great thinker and political activist, who turned out to be too idealistic for his times, and too unrealistic about the costs and purity of his ideals. It comes across as a cautionary tale for anyone who becomes active politically, seeks power for his cause and holds to the belief that reason and ideology will trump ego and personal ambitions when it comes to what to do with that power. Trotsky was like many of us who push political causes and volunteer for campaigns, headstrong and certain of his cause, and convinced that the issues and the moral convictions behind the cause were all that mattered. We all have this idea that if we get our own kind in power, people who believe what we believe and think like we think, that all will be good. Trotsky's experience is testament to the reality that in real life it just doesn't often happen that way. He won his campaign (in this case the russian civil war) and got his people in power. But it didn't turn out like he dreamed. Trotsky came to realize, too late as it turns out, that the lust for power and personal ambition all too often end up mattering more than issues and philosophies, and can push people to make compromise and away from their ideals and away from noble causes.
What about the Irish "troubles"
It's hard to understand how there could have been serious problems to cause the strife it caused. I asked a man who immigrated from Ireland to explain how there could be such animosity when often it might be hard to tell which side a person was on. He replied so vehemently, "Oh, you can tell all right" that I simply left the question unanswered all these years. And now I'm wondering how Iraqi Muslims will deal with changing their last names to fit the sect of the hour.
In Christian evolution, it seems that as the position of the church diminishes, the old splits seem less important. The pope visited his Orthodox counterpart. Episcipalians accept Catholic baptism as sufficient. Sojourners call themselves Evangelicals.
My hunch is that political oneupmanship causes more religious strife than it profits from. Eventually, people realize when they are being used.





























Recently I have been reading
Recently I have been reading of and about Rabbi Abraham Heschel, a remarkable man who was descended from generations of orthodox hasidic jews but who famously broke with jewish orthodoxy to reach out to other religions. Heschel broke from his own ranks and was villified by numerous of them, in the 50's and 60's for reaching out to the Catholic Church, becoming active in the civil rights movement (he was a close friend and advisor to Martin Luther King), and speaking out against the Vietnam war.
Heschel personally went to Rome and pleaded with Pope Paul VI that the Second Vatican Council was the time to deal with historical anti-semitism in church doctrine.
Heschel said:
"Both Judaism and Christianity share the
prophet’s belief that God chooses agents
through whom His will is made known and His
work done throughout history. Both Judaism
and Christianity live in the certainty that
mankind is in need of ultimate redemption, that
God is involved in human history, that in
relations between man and man God is at stake;
that the humiliation of man is a disgrace of God."
Heschel specifically wanted eliminated any language that stated or even implied that jews need convert to catholicism to be one with God. He declared to the Pope that faced with the choice of conversion or death in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, he would choose Auschwitz."
More importantly, Heschel attacked both physical and spiritual isolationism. He said "“Unless we learn how to help one another, we will only weaken each other†Also, "The misery and fear of
alienation from God make Jew and Christian cry
together". Heschel believed that "“The world is too small for anything but mutual care and deep respect; the world is too great for anything but responsibility for one anotherâ€
This all sounds so wonderful that it is hard to imagine how intensely villified Heschel was among both orthodox jews AND catholics opposed to the changes made by the Second Vatican Council. Heschel's own hasidic colleagues blasted him, saying that anti-semitism was a christian problem, and that it was unseemly and undignified for Jewish people to plead in their own behalf. Also speaking out against isolationism ran against the historical experience of jews. Heschel did not want all of these organized religions living in their own worlds, cut off from each other, he saw each as part of the other, invested in the other.
I wish Heschel was still alive, because his words really speak to current times. There is a lack of *connection* between religions and between peoples. I think Heschel would say that we are jews and we are christians and we are muslims and we are agnostics, but we are humans first, and should identify by what we have in common first, and not by what separates us.
(many of the Heschel quotes can be found at the united states holocaust museum's website, ushmm.org, and at www.edah.org/backend/JournalArticle/4_2_Kimelman.pdf)