It's official : Hillary to run for President, so she kills the Liberal Blogosphere first
R.I.P
2003-2006
With Peter Daou's hiring, Hillary Clinton sends a very loud and clear message that she is running for President. It also demonstrates that, if she is going to run, she needs to destroy the Liberal Blogosphere as we know it.
Long live the liberal blogosphere.
It was good while it lasted.
From A Well-Known Political Blogger Is Hired by the Clinton Campaign - New York Times:
WASHINGTON, June 26 -- Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign has hired Peter Daou, one of the most prominent political bloggers in the nation, to help disseminate her message in a forum that has not always been that hospitable to her.The move underscores the degree to which bloggers --the authors of Web logs, or blogs-- have begun to transform American politics. In many cases, candidates have even set up their own blogs, with staffers answering questions, presenting policy proposals and posting campaign literature and videos. Mrs. Clinton, who is up for re-election this year and is a possible presidential candidate for 2008, has been a frequent target of bloggers, particularly liberals who are angry over her refusal to disavow her vote in 2002 to authorize President Bush to use force in Iraq.
With Peter, "I'm down with triangulation" Daou, we have proof positive that the so-called blog revolution as witnessed in the Liberal Blogosphere was a manufactured by lower level political consultants with access to big media yet shut out by consulting turf wars on The Hill, and after the groundbreaking Howard Dean and Wesley Clark campaign. Yeah, I'm counting the Clarkites because unfortunately a lot of people don't give credit to the technological and networking innovations of the Clark campaign.
I mean, c'mon. Daou worked for John Kerry in 2004. Markos and Jerome with Dean. There are many more prominent bloggers who came out of the various 2004 campaigns but I'm being lazy at the moment to name them all.
The point being : It does not matter if you are a good or bad political consultant. The point is these people are not really "the grassroots". We are not yet the grassroots.
People with a vested economic interest in candidacies cannot agence or put forth a true revolutionary movement. Which is why I have said over and over again, this so-called revolution is not true at all. We have peeked into what is possible. Let's say, what we are seeing is the proof-of-concept; but to get the 18 year-old kid in Loisaida to feel compelled to plug into the political process, we have a loooooong way to go.
To make this a real democratic movement, we will need to walk away from the wannabe king-makers and really invest our time and energies into advocacy organizations and citizen networks. We need to get people and advocates together in the same online communities, email lists, forums and chat rooms as well as the meetups, rallies and door-to-door friendraisings.
We need to bring everyday citizens who don't have time to work as activists or write as pundits but want to do more, contribute more personally (not just financially), to the causes they care the most. We need to make it easy for regular folks to be engaged in the political process.
With the death of the liberal blogosphere hopefully we will see a true progressive movement arise online and off.
Long live the liberal blogosphere.
May it rest in pieces and and may we witness a million progressive networks rise from the remains.
It was interesting while it lasted.
Activism | Blogosphere | Blogs | Internet | Media | Networks | Politics | Democrats | Hillary Clinton
It is unbelievably frustrating
There is a war raging in the Democratic party and nobody wants to own up to it. It's really ridiculous, you'd think that at a time like this she would be going for a win-at-all-costs strategies.
You are right, I think it's vanity. If she really cared about the state of the country, she would be working to get the Democratic party unified and rallying for a small pool of people so we don't waste time and energy in long primaries.
But noooooooooo. She's got to prove some point or another.
I have heard so many regular folk --Republicans and Democrats-- wondering why they didn't do anything to get Gore in the White House. You know, the "I feel guilty, what if..."
And there's John Edwards who has been really focused and committed to push poverty to the forefront.
Sigh.
Fucking frustrating, to say the least.
Waiting
That's what we're all doing. Waiting to be told what our two choices are.
Nance
Two Choices Adding Up to
no real choice at all, and no real progress.
Just Revealing Old Problem of "Liberal" Blogosphere
From the beginning the "left" of the blogosphere has been too institutionally tied to the Democratic Party. Matt Stoler and Chris Bowers in their report The Emergence of the Progressive Blogosphere tried to claim this was a strength of the blogospheric "left." But of course, both Bowers and Stoller are themselves Democratic consultants.
In fact, far from being a strength, the fact the major "left" websites put party before principle have always limited the ability of progressive bloggers to push politics leftward. Many of major "liberal" sites were founded by once or future Democratic consultants. Daou's joining forces with Clinton is hardly the end of anything. It's the continuation of what's always been the achilles heal of the so-called left of the blogosphere.
I might agree with this
because in my mind progressive today needs to be post-partisan, rather than partisan and equating to Democrat. But I'd like to hear more about what YOU mean, and think about it?
to me it's the end of the ruse
that there is such a thing as a revolution in media happening at the moment. there is a great 'disturbance in the force' but nothing close to revolutionary since, as you said, too many people in those blogs are way too partisan.
I am a pragmatist. I did not vote for Nader and would never vote for a clone of his in the future either. I would most likely vote for Democrats 99% of the time. But I would never use this platform to tout conservative Democrats. And honestly, I could never ever envision the existence of a progressive Republican.
But I would always seek progressive candidates, Democrats or otherwise.
Yeah, that comes close
for me, so maybe, I'm nothing like the moderate centrist I sometimes signal in my frustration with partisans gigging each other. Maybe instead I'm philosophically and politically over the next progressive edge somewhere already, impatient for folks to leave their nominal parties and come join me in the Great Beyond?
































She only runs by vanity
Hillary only runs by vanity
When Bill Clinton was in his initial primary for President, I changed from Independant to Democrat the then and now true convservitive party. To support someone of intellect capable of making the right choices gaining the momentum of becoming electable as President. The psuedo and false conservative movement GOP (dixiecrat hate voters, and republican bikers on food stamps) will prevent Hillary from ever winning. Regardless of what criminal Nixon like dirty tricks it takes. Give us someone of intellect that people can like such as John Edwards.
Please Hillary voice your views but dont taint the election. Pills or not narcotics heathen Rush Limbaugh already has too many people hating you.