PLAY: The Future With Sneakers On

Play makes children nimble—neurobiologically, mentally, behaviorally—capable of adapting to a rapidly evolving world. That makes it just about the best preparation for life in the 21st century. Psychologists believe that play cajoles people toward their human potential because it preserves all the possibilities nervous systems tend to otherwise prune away...

There's only one graduation requirement and over 95 percent of students meet it. They have to write and present a thesis about how they're prepared to be an adult. It takes time to write, even more time to figure out

...Students have become lute-makers, auto technicians, musicians, equestrian-farmers, dedicated environmentalists. Some have started their own companies at 18. Others take retail or service jobs to get money for travel abroad...They do what they do not by default or by obligation but from a sense of understanding what they're doing and why...
(and) go on to lead deeply satisfying lives. Most are unusually resilient. Almost all feel that they are in control of their destiny.

The alumni study shows that a "spectacularly high number" pursue careers in the arts—music, art, dance, writing, acting. Math, business and education are popular routes, too.

...It may be...that the Sudbury-style schools work so well because they are small...But on a 10-acre estate in Massachusetts, 200 kids are having a hell of a time preparing for the future.


Hara Estroff Marano in "Psychology Today" May/June 2006, sizing up Sudbury Valley School


http://culturekitchen.com/quotes/play_the_future_with_sneakers_on
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
JJ Ross's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Nance Confer's picture

Doesn't this

sound like unschooling, in a group setting? Reminds me of our house, anyway. Smiling

I think I need to add this link to the ed discussion I think I may be the only one still interested in over on DailyKos. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/6/28/73725/5108

Nance


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

Exactly

what I thought, and the kids I live with agreed.

And right in Massachusetts all this time, home of public schooling, compulsory attendance laws and not-very-liberal home education laws -- apparently ever-blue MA only meant to compel a better institution than factories for all the poor's children, but not to preclude truly wonderful, free confidence-building places where privileged kids could be nurtured and supported along their own unique path, without weapons of mass instruction.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
NanceConfer's picture

$6000

a year does seem a bit steep. Not too many familes would be able to afford that.

Even if they knew about it!

But we know, depending on what you want to do, you can provide this sort of environment for a lot less.

Nance


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
NanceConfer's picture

OTOH :)

How much is spent per child for public schooling in MA? Even in the poorest neighborhoods in MA, it must be close to this amount. . .

Nance


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

Two Comments in One

Responding both to your conversation with TeacherKen at Daily Kos, whose absolute progressive "prerequisite" is you must first commit to unlimited cash and control for schoolfolk, no questions asked, or else you can't converse about school change in his progressive education diary --
and also to per pupil spending, why it's so high that charters and many privates are undercutting PS, yet somehow it's never enough to actually deliver that mythical free liberal education that leaves no child behind.

In 1960, annual spending on public education nationwide was about $3,000 per student. In the years since, that amount has swollen to over $9,400 per student. Those are inflation-adjusted dollars, so spending on public education in real terms has more than tripled, with dubious results.

For years the teachers unions have sustained a PR campaign that should be the envy of corporate CEOs everywhere. . . The teachers' union cartel is a larcenous monopoly.

Progressive or protectionist? Can PS (or any other politics) manage to be both, or does combining them make you unable to manage either one?


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

http://www.usatoday.com/print

To succeed, children need time to play, be with family, and read.

Sara Bennett is the co-author, with Nancy Kalish, of the upcoming book, The Case Against Homework: How Homework is Hurting Our Children and What We Can Do About It (Crown).

Many parents are exasperated by how homework dominates their children's lives, even over the summer. But what they don't realize is that most studies find little correlation between homework and achievement in elementary school and only a moderate correlation in middle school. Even in high school, studies find that too much homework is counterproductive...

Experts believe reading to be the most important educational activity. Yet a Scholastic/Yankelovich study released last month found that reading for fun declines sharply after age 8. The number one reason according to their parents: too much homework...

*Children need to play* (one of the most important tasks of childhood according to child development experts), to eat dinner with their families (one of the biggest predictors of academic success), to talk with family and friends, to develop their passions and to read. These activities, not homework, will ensure that our children are happy and competitive in a highly competitive world.

"Ask MisEducation"


User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

We read

QUOTES

"Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the U. S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them, and these are to be paid out of the national taxes. Does this not involve the principle of a national establishment...?"


— -- James Madison, "Essay on Monopolies" unpublished until 1946, cited in Brant, Irving, The Bill of Rights, 1965, from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Poll