Poverty GreatSociety TV Currencies Jobs

Show me the money! What money?

Who makes money and who cares? What is money? A symbol of wealth as described in text books? Congealed energy as I’ve heard it described in think tank circles? However it is explained, money cannot be eaten. For protection from weather, one newspaper outranks a hundred-dollar bill.
Mostly, we could agree money needs the helping hand of a number to make it relevant and a country to make it real. Countries can be relevant only as long as they have a currency. Be it cruzeiro or yen, we identify with a qualifier in front of the currency’s name (Brazilian and Japanese). Currently it takes less than .80 Euro to buy a US dollar.
We used to hear about “the almighty dollar” but not now.
All Americans do not think the same about money. Some, with piles of it, worry that if they don’t watch out, “the government” will write laws to tax it. Those most covetous even worry about what the government wants to do with it after they die.
Some of us have enough to “get by” but are afraid of falling behind. Our table talk is filled with “what ifs.”
And then there are those who scarcely have money. They live from paycheck to paycheck, hoping there’ll be one. In their world, they hope the lights stay on so they can watch beautiful cars hug the curves of American scenery and movies where there are other curves to be hugged. To break their trance, politicians come on with flashy ads to tell them how their troubles will disappear if they vote for them. They can’t buy cars. They can’t buy beauty products, and they don’t fall for politicians who “all sound the same.”


Margaret Bassett's picture

|
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 2319 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

I of all people should know better. The civil rights movement in the U.S. told women to stop talking about gender issues because first the fight against racism had to be won. The feminist movement frowned at women of colour raising their issues, insisting that first the fight against the patriarchy had to be won. The nationalist movements in Africa insisted that feminism was a corrupt and decadent western import, and that first we had to capture our earthly kingdoms, and achieve our panAfricanist Nirvana, before we started looking at "side issues". And those of us who are interested in our contemporary political dynamics have fallen into the same pit of not tackling the prickly, the uncomfortable questions now: we are waiting to win the larger battle before we clean our house. There is always another battle or another issue, and the matters that matter to the foot soldiers are postponed for yet another day. Yet, these issues ARE the battle. We fight for freedom --and do not imagine we are doing anything less--because it is the freedom to live our lives the way we want, from the jobs we choose to the people we fall in love with. If we cannot tackle them, then we are not equipped to tackle anything. What are the lines of difference we draw? For what do we engage, argue, participate and in some heroes' cases, take awful risks? For what?


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify